ReviewCurrent pollution reports2020
Application of DNA-Nanosensor for Environmental Monitoring: Recent Advances and Perspectives.
Review in Current pollution reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-Based Environmental Remediation: Functional Principles, Material Platforms, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming soil decontamination: the role and prospects of nanotechnological remediation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Advancements and Prospects in DNA-Based Bioanalytical Technology for Environmental Toxicant Detection.JACS Au · 2025Review
- Development of a Novel Colorimetric pH Biosensor Based on A-Motif Structures for Rapid Food Freshness Monitoring and Spoilage Detection.Biosensors · 2024Article
- In vitro exposed magnesium oxide nanoparticles enhanced the growth of legume Macrotyloma uniflorum.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Electrochemical Detection Platform Based on RGO Functionalized with Diazonium Salt for DNA Hybridization.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Colloidal Gold Immunochromatography and ELISA Traceability of Tetracycline Residues from Raw Milk to its Dairy Products.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEnvironmental pollutants are threat to human beings. Pollutants can lead to human health and environment hazards. The purpose of this review is to summarize the work done on detection of environmental pollutants using DNA nanosensors and challenges in the areas that can be focused for safe environment. RECENT
findingsMost of the DNA-based nanosensors designed so far use DNA as recognition element. ssDNA, dsDNA, complementary mismatched DNA, aptamers, and G-quadruplex DNA are commonly used as probes in nanosensors. More and more DNA sequences are being designed that can specifically detect various pollutants even simultaneously in complex milk, wastewater, soil, blood, tap water, river, and pond water samples. The feasibility of direct detection, ease of designing, and analysis makes DNA nanosensors fit for future point-of-care applications. SUMMARY: DNA nanosensors are easy to design and have good sensitivity. DNA component and nanomaterials can be designed in a controlled manner to detect various environmental pollutants. This review identifies the recent advances in DNA nanosensor designing and opportunities available to design nanosensors for unexplored pathogens, antibiotics, pesticides, GMO, heavy metals, and other toxic pollutant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.