Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346245›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020

[Implementation of the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil: barriers and trategiesObstáculos y estrategias para la aplicación de las Directrices Nacionales para el Parto Normal en el Brasil].

Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Maritsa C Bortoli, Cézar D Luquine, Cintia F Oliveira, Tereza S Toma, Aline A V Ribeiro, Taís R Tesser, Daphne Rattner, Avila Vidal, Yluska Mendes and 3 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barriers to implementing childbirth recommendations in Brazil: the women's perspective.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jorge Otávio Maia BarretoFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília DF Brasil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Maritsa C BortoliSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Cézar D LuquineSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Cintia F OliveiraSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Tereza S TomaSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Aline A V RibeiroSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Taís R TesserSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Daphne RattnerUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva Brasília (DF) Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Avila VidalUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva Brasília (DF) Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Yluska MendesUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva Brasília (DF) Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Viviane CarvalhoUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva Brasília (DF) Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Mônica Almeida NeriUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva Salvador (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Evelina ChapmanFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília DF Brasil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present report describes the process and results obtained with a knowledge translation project developed in three stages to identify barriers to the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil as well strategies for effective implementation. The Improving Programme Implementation through Embedded Research (iPIER) model and the Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools provided the methodological framework for the project. In the first stage, the quality of the Guidelines was evaluated and the barriers preventing implementation of the recommendations were identified through review of the global evidence and analysis of contributions obtained in a public consultation process. In the second stage, an evidence synthesis was used as basis for a deliberative dialogue aimed at prioritizing the barriers identified. Finally, a second evidence synthesis was presented in a new deliberative dialogue to discuss six options to address the prioritized barriers: 1) promote the use of multifaceted interventions; 2) promote educational interventions for the adoption of guidelines; 3) perform audits and provide feedback to adjust professional practice; 4) use reminders to mediate the interaction between workers and service users; 5) enable patient-mediated interventions; and 6) engage opinion leaders to promote the use of guidelines. The processes and results associated with each stage were documented and formulated to inform a review and update of the Guidelines and the development of an implementation plan for the recommendations. An effective implementation of the Guidelines is relevant to improve the care provided during labor and childbirth in Brazil.

Indexed as

BrazilEvidence-based practiceEvidence-informed policyimplementation sciencenatural childbirthpractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID33346245
PMCPMC7745726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.