SynthesisThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2021
Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Osteosarcopenia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Optimal resistance training parameters for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Progressive Resistance Training for Concomitant Increases in Muscle Strength and Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of resistance training on body composition and physical function in elderly patients with osteosarcopenic obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Pooled it
- Why Osteosarcopenia Matters: Clinical and Investigative Implications.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Aging-Driven Inter-Organ Crosstalk in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: From Immunometabolic Drift to Multisystem Frailty.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- The mediating role of sarcopenia in the link between loneliness and frailty among nursing home residents: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Review
- Assessing bone and muscle health and their association in a Mongolian population aged 40 and older: a pioneering observational study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Observational
- Association of calf circumference with osteoporosis and hip fracture in middle-aged and older adults: a secondary analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Osteosarcopenia predicts greater risk of functional disability than sarcopenia: a longitudinal analysis of FraDySMex cohort study.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
- The Interconnection Between Muscle and Bone: A Common Clinical Management Pathway.Calcified tissue international · 2024Review
- Association between sarcopenia and osteoporosis: the cross-sectional study from NHANES 1999-2020 and a bi-directions Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Physical activity and osteosarcopenia in Korean adults aged 65 years and older: a national cross-sectional study using the KNHANES data.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Associations of the Alpha-Actinin Three Genotype with Bone and Muscle Mass Loss among Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Is sarcopenia associated with osteoporosis? A cross-sectional study of 262 women with hip fracture.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Global trends and hotspots in research on osteoporosis rehabilitation: A bibliometric study and visualization analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Sarcopenia and bone health: new acquisitions for a firm liaison.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022Review
- A study of diet in older community-dwelling adults in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from the Southampton Longitudinal Study of Ageing (SaLSA).Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Exercise and Nutrition Impact on Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia-The Incidence of Osteosarcopenia: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteosarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome defined by the concomitant presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis (loss of bone mineral density (BMD)) and sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass and/or function), which increases the risk of falls, fractures, and premature mortality.
objectiveTo examine the efficacy of non-pharmacological (exercise and/or nutritional) interventions on musculoskeletal measures and outcomes in osteosarcopenic adults by reviewing findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsThis review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020179292) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs assessing the effect of at least one non-pharmacological intervention (any form of exercise and/or supplementation with protein, vitamin D, calcium or creatine) on any musculoskeletal measure/outcome of interest (BMD, bone strength/turnover, muscle mass and strength, physical performance, falls/fractures) in adults with osteosarcopenia as defined by any proposed criteria.
resultsTwo RCTs (of n=106 older osteosarcopenic adults (≥65 years)) assessing the effects of progressive resistance training (RT) (via resistance bands or machines; 2-3 times/week; ~60 minutes in duration) were eligible for inclusion. The two RCTs demonstrated moderate quality evidence that RT increases muscle mass, strength, and quality, with changes in strength and quality occurring before muscle mass (12 vs 28 weeks). There was low quality evidence that RT increases lumbar spine BMD and maintains total hip BMD when performed for 12 and 18 months, respectively, and moderate quality evidence that RT has no effect on markers of bone turnover or physical performance. No major adverse effects were recorded in either of the RCTs. There were no eligible RCTs examining the impact of nutritional interventions.
conclusionChronic RT is safe and effective at potentiating gains in muscle mass, strength, and quality, and increasing or maintaining BMD in older osteosarcopenic adults. No RCT has examined the effects of protein, vitamin D, calcium, or creatine against a control/placebo in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.