Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33369721›Full record

ReviewDrugs2021

Inhibiting CDK4/6 in Breast Cancer with Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib: Similarities and Differences.

C Louwrens Braal, Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Saskia M Wilting, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen, Agnes Jager

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cancers · 2026
    Review

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C Louwrens BraalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.braal@erasmusmc.nl.
Elisabeth M JongbloedDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia M WiltingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors belong to a new class of drugs that interrupt proliferation of malignant cells by inhibiting progression through the cell cycle. Three such inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib were recently approved for breast cancer treatment in various settings and combination regimens. On the basis of their impressive efficacy, all three CDK4/6 inhibitors now play an important role in the treatment of patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer; however, their optimal use still needs to be established. The three drugs have many similarities in both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, there are some differences on the basis of which the choice for a particular CDK4/6 inhibitor for an individual patient can be important. In this article, the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors are reviewed and important future directions of the clinical applicability of CDK4/6 inhibitors will be discussed.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6HumansPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridinesabemaciclibAminopyridinesBenzimidazolesCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6palbociclibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridinesribociclib

Identifiers

PMID33369721
PMCPMC7952354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.