Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370367›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Prediction of preeclampsia risk in first time pregnant women: Metabolite biomarkers for a clinical test.

Louise C Kenny, Grégoire Thomas, Lucilla Poston, Jenny E Myers, Nigel A B Simpson, Fergus P McCarthy, Leslie W Brown, Alison E Bond, Robin Tuytten, Philip N Baker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Second-trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule-out.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Presenting a prediction model for HELLP syndrome through data mining.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise C KennyFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Grégoire ThomasSQU4RE, Lokeren, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-9438
Lucilla PostonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jenny E MyersMaternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nigel A B SimpsonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Fergus P McCarthyIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Leslie W BrownMetabolomic Diagnostics, Cork, Ireland.
Alison E BondMetabolomic Diagnostics, Cork, Ireland.
Robin TuyttenMetabolomic Diagnostics, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-7335
Philip N BakerCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints Consortium
King's College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia remains a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Accurate prediction of preeclampsia risk would enable more effective, risk-based prenatal care pathways. Current risk assessment algorithms depend on clinical risk factors largely unavailable for first-time pregnant women. Delivering accurate preeclampsia risk assessment to this cohort of women, therefore requires for novel biomarkers. Here, we evaluated the relevance of metabolite biomarker candidates for their selection into a prototype rapid, quantitative Liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based clinical screening assay. First, a library of targeted LC-MS/MS assays for metabolite biomarker candidates was developed, using a medium-throughput translational metabolomics workflow, to verify biomarker potential in the Screening-for-Pregnancy-Endpoints (SCOPE, European branch) study. A variable pre-selection step was followed by the development of multivariable prediction models for pre-defined clinical use cases, i.e., prediction of preterm preeclampsia risk and of any preeclampsia risk. Within a large set of metabolite biomarker candidates, we confirmed the potential of dilinoleoyl-glycerol and heptadecanoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine to effectively complement Placental Growth Factor, an established preeclampsia biomarker, for the prediction of preeclampsia risk in first-time pregnancies without overt risk factors. These metabolites will be considered for integration in a prototype rapid, quantitative LC-MS/MS assay, and subsequent validation in an independent cohort.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChromatography, LiquidEarly DiagnosisFemaleGlycerolHumansMaternal AgeMetabolomicsMultivariate AnalysisNew ZealandPlacenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaPregnancyBiomarkersGlycerolPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID33370367
PMCPMC7769282
OpenAlexW3113408700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.