Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370652›Full record

ArticleCognition2021

Children perform extensive information gathering when it is not costly.

Aislinn Bowler, Johanna Habicht, Madeleine E Moses-Payne, Niko Steinbeis, Michael Moutoussis, Tobias U Hauser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Active information sampling in health and disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Boosting Serotonin Increases Information Gathering by Reducing Subjective Cognitive Costs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploration heuristics decrease during youth.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aislinn BowlerMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Johanna HabichtMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Madeleine E Moses-PayneUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Niko SteinbeisDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom.
Michael MoutoussisMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Tobias U HauserMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: t.hauser@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/R015759/1Wellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 211155/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often face decisions where little is known about the choice options. Gathering information prior to making a choice is an important strategy to improve decision making under uncertainty. This is of particular importance during childhood and adolescence, when knowledge about the world is still limited. To examine how much information youths gather, we asked 107 children (8-9 years, N = 30), early (12-13 years, N = 41) and late adolescents (16-17 years, N = 36) to perform an information sampling task. We find that children gather significantly more information before making a decision compared to adolescents, but only if it does not come with explicit costs. Using computational modelling, we find that this is because children have reduced subjective costs for gathering information. Our findings thus demonstrate how children overcome their limited knowledge and neurocognitive constraints by deploying excessive information gathering, a developmental feature that could inform aberrant information gathering in psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentChildHumansUncertaintyCognitive developmentComputational modellingInformation gathering

Identifiers

PMID33370652
PMCPMC7871012
OpenAlexW3116970240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.