Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33370869›Full record

ArticleStem cell research2020

Distinct molecular profile and restricted stem cell potential defines the prospective human cranial neural crest from embryonic stem cell state.

Maneeshi S Prasad, Rebekah M Charney, Lipsa J Patel, Martín I García-Castro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Post-transcriptional regulation in cranial neural crest cells expands developmental potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maneeshi S PrasadSchool of Medicine Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USA. Electronic address: maneeshi@ucr.edu.
Rebekah M CharneySchool of Medicine Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Lipsa J PatelSchool of Medicine Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Martín I García-CastroSchool of Medicine Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, USA. Electronic address: martin.garcia-castro@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Molecular Interactions During Neural Crest FormationR01DE017914 · NIDCR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GARCIA-CASTRO, MARTIN I. · 2007 to 2025
$6.3M
Specification, induction and development of the neural crest in rabbit embryosR21DE028112 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI GARCIA-CASTRO, MARTIN I. · 2018 to 2019
$409k
The role of the transcriptional repressor ZEB2 in human neural crest cell formation and craniofacial pathologyK99DE029878 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI CHARNEY, REBEKAH · 2020 to 2022
$305k
Identification of a novel regulatory program underlying the early specification of Neural Crest cellsF32DE027862 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI CHARNEY, REBEKAH · 2018 to 2020
$133k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE027862NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE029878NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017914NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE028112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural crest cells are an embryonic multipotent stem cell population. Recent studies in model organisms have suggested that neural crest cells are specified earlier than previously thought, at blastula stages. However, the molecular dynamics of early neural crest specification, and functional changes from pluripotent precursors to early specified NC, remain to be elucidated. In this report, we utilized a robust human model of cranial neural crest formation to address the distinct molecular character of the earliest stages of neural crest specification and assess the functional differences from its embryonic stem cell precursor. Our human neural crest model reveals a rapid change in the epigenetic state of neural crest and pluripotency genes, accompanied by changes in gene expression upon Wnt-based induction from embryonic stem cells. These changes in gene expression are directly regulated by the transcriptional activity of β-catenin. Furthermore, prospective cranial neural crest cells are characterized by restricted stem cell potential compared to embryonic stem cells. Our results suggest that human neural crest induced by Wnt/β-catenin signaling from human embryonic stem cells rapidly acquire a prospective neural crest cell state defined by a unique molecular signature and endowed with limited potential compared to pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

Human Embryonic Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationHumansNeural CrestProspective StudiesWnt Signaling PathwayCell fateCranial neural crestEmbryonic stem cellsNeural crestNeural plate borderPluripotencySpecificationStem cells

Identifiers

PMID33370869
PMCPMC7932500
OpenAlexW3104324457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.