Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377972›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2021

Effect of Capivasertib in Patients With an AKT1 E17K-Mutated Tumor: NCI-MATCH Subprotocol EAY131-Y Nonrandomized Trial.

Kevin Kalinsky, Fangxin Hong, Carolyn K McCourt, Jasgit C Sachdev, Edith P Mitchell, James A Zwiebel, L Austin Doyle, Lisa M McShane, Shuli Li, Robert J Gray and 10 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00700882 (A Phase II Trial of Dasatinib in KIT-Positive Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Stage IV Mucosal, Acral and Vulvovaginal Melanomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00700882 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Dasatinib in KIT-Positive Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Stage IV Mucosal, Acral and Vulvovaginal Melanomas

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2009 to 2020Enrolled81ConditionsMelanoma (Skin)Armsdasatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Phase II Study of Taselisib inJCO precision oncology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in prostate cancer: Molecular dysregulation, therapeutic advances, and future directions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ipatasertib in Patients with Tumors with AKT Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1K.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Concordance between Tumor Tissue and Plasma DNA Genotyping in the NCI-MATCH Trial (EAY131).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. AKT1Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin KalinskyDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Fangxin HongDepartment of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carolyn K McCourtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Jasgit C SachdevDepartment of Medicine, TGen/HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Edith P MitchellDepartment of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
James A ZwiebelDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
L Austin DoyleDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lisa M McShaneDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Shuli LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)-ACRIN (American College of Radiology Imaging Network) Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert J GrayDepartment of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)-ACRIN (American College of Radiology Imaging Network) Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Larry V RubinsteinDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
David PattonDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Paul M WilliamsDivision of Cancer Therapeutics and Diagnosis, Molecular Characterization and Assay Development Laboratory, Leidos, Frederick, Maryland.
Stanley R HamiltonDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Barbara A ConleyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter J O'DwyerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lyndsay N HarrisDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Carlos L ArteagaDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas.
Alice P ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Keith T FlahertyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
National Cancer Institute · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEastern Cooperative Oncology Group · USHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterHonorHealth · USLeidos (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
UT Southwestern NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) LAPS - Supplemental Funds YR4UG1CA233302 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Eric Gerber · 2019 to 2026
$6.4M
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center LAPS Institutional CollaborationUG1CA233341 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Steven Cohen, Mitchell Edelson · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233302NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial, agents targeting genetic tumor abnormalities are administered to patients. In the NCI-MATCH subprotocol EAY131-Y trial, patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor received the pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib. Objective: To assess the objective response rate (ORR) of capivasertib in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between July 13, 2016, and August 10, 2017, patients in the NCI-MATCH trial were enrolled and assigned to the subprotocol EAY131-Y nonrandomized trial. Patients included adults with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor that had progressed with standard treatment, and these patients were assigned to receive capivasertib. Tumor assessments were repeated every 2 cycles. Data analysis of this evaluable population was performed from November 8, 2019, to March 12, 2020. Interventions: The study treatment was capivasertib, 480 mg, orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off weekly in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effect. If patients continued hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer, the capivasertib dose was 400 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the ORR (ie, complete response [CR] and partial response) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, version 1.1. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival, and safety. Results: In total, 35 evaluable and analyzable patients were included, of whom 30 were women (86%), and the median (range) age was 61 (32-73) years. The most prevalent cancers were breast (18 [51%]), including 15 patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-negative and 3 with triple-negative disease, and gynecologic (11 [31%]) cancers. The ORR rate was 28.6% (95% CI, 15%-46%). One patient with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma achieved a CR and remained on therapy at 35.6 months. Patients with confirmed partial response had the following tumor types: 7 had HR-positive/ERBB2-negative breast cancer, 1 had uterine leiomyosarcoma, and 1 had oncocytic parotid gland carcinoma and continued receiving treatment at 28.8 months. Sixteen patients (46%) had stable disease as the best response, 2 (6%) had progressive disease, and 7 (20%) were not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 28.4 months, the overall 6-month PFS rate was 50% (95% CI, 35%-71%). Capivasertib was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 of 35 patients (31%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events included hyperglycemia (8 [23%]) and rash (4 [11%]). One grade 4 hyperglycemic adverse event was reported. Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized trial found that, in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor treated with capivasertib, a clinically significant ORR was achieved, including 1 CR. Clinically meaningful activity with single-agent capivasertib was demonstrated in refractory malignant neoplasms, including rare cancers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00700882.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrimidinesPyrrolesUnited StatesAKT1 protein, humancapivasertibProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrimidinesPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID33377972
PMCPMC7774047
OpenAlexW3115202206

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.