ArticlePloS one2020
Estimation of non-constant variance in isothermal titration calorimetry using an ITC measurement model.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Protocols for protein-DNA binding analysis of a zinc finger transcription factor bound to its cognate promoter.STAR protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is the gold standard for accurate measurement of thermodynamic parameters in solution reactions. In the data processing of ITC, the non-constant variance of the heat requires special consideration. The variance function approach has been successfully applied in previous studies, but is found to fail under certain conditions in this work. Here, an explicit ITC measurement model consisting of main thermal effects and error components has been proposed to quantitatively evaluate and predict the non-constant variance of the heat data under various conditions. Monte Carlo simulation shows that the ITC measurement model provides higher accuracy and flexibility than variance function in high c-value reactions or with additional error components, for example, originated from the fluctuation of the concentrations or other properties of the solutions. The experimental design of basic error evaluation is optimized accordingly and verified by both Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. An easy-to-run Python source code is provided to illustrate the establishment of the ITC measurement model and the estimation of heat variances. The accurate and reliable non-constant variance of heat is helpful to the application of weighted least squares regression, the proper evaluation or selection of the reaction model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.