Evidence mapPaperPMID 33389082Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test.

Ai Ting Goh, Jie Ying Michelle Choy, Xin Hui Chua, Shalini Ponnalagu, Chin Meng Khoo, Clare Whitton, Rob Martinus van Dam, Ciarán Gerard Forde

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04522063 (Impact of Variation in Food Intakes, Physical Activity, and Psychological Stress on Fluctuations in 24-hr Plasma Glucose Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04522063 completednot on this map

Impact of Variation in Food Intakes, Physical Activity, and Psychological Stress on Fluctuations in 24-hr Plasma Glucose Levels

TypeobservationalSponsorSingapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology InnovationRan2019 to 2020Enrolled33ConditionsAdults
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ai Ting GohClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute for Food and Biotechnology Innovation, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117599, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-208X
Jie Ying Michelle ChoyClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute for Food and Biotechnology Innovation, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117599, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-8244
Xin Hui ChuaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-4681
Shalini PonnalaguClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute for Food and Biotechnology Innovation, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Chin Meng KhooYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-2391
Clare WhittonSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-2432
Rob Martinus van DamSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-8734
Ciarán Gerard FordeClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute for Food and Biotechnology Innovation, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117599, Singapore. Ciaran_Forde@sifbi.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4001-9182

Funding

Singapore Biomedical Research Council Food Structure Engineering for Nutrition and Health H18/01/a0/E11Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council NMRC/CG/M009/2017_NUH/NUHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVariations in specific oral processing behaviours may contribute to differences in glucose, insulin and satiety responses to a standardised test meal. This study tested how natural variations in oral processing between slower and faster eaters contribute to differences in post-prandial glucose (PP glucose), insulin response (PP insulin) and post-meal satiety for a standardised test meal.

methodsThirty-three participants with higher risk for type 2 diabetes consumed a standardised test-meal while being video recorded to derive specific oral processing behaviours. Plasma glucose, insulin and satiety measures were collected at baseline, during and post meal. Participants were split into slower and faster eaters using median split based on their eating rates and individual bolus properties were analysed at the point of swallow.

resultsThere were large variations in eating rate (p < 0.001). While there was no significant difference in PP glucose response (p > 0.05), slower eaters showed significantly higher PP insulin between 45 and 60 min (p < 0.001). Slower eaters had longer oro-sensory exposure and increased bolus saliva uptake which was associated with higher PP glucose iAUC. Faster eating rate and larger bolus particle size at swallow correlated with lower PP glucose iAUC. A slower eating rate with greater chews per bite significantly increased insulin iAUC. Faster eaters also consistently rated their hunger and desire to eat higher than slower eaters (p < 0.05).

conclusionsNatural variations in eating rate and the associated oral processing contributed to differences in PP glucose, PP insulin and satiety responses. Encouraging increased chewing and longer oral-exposure time during consumption, may promote early glucose absorption and greater insulin and satiety responses, and help support euglycaemia.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04522063.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Satiety ResponseBlood GlucoseEatingHumansInsulinMealsBlood GlucoseInsulinEating behaviourEating rateGlycaemic responsesSatiety

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.