Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33390182›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Effectiveness of task-shifting for the detection of diabetic retinopathy in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid review protocol.

Covadonga Bascaran, Nyawira Mwangi, Fabrizio D'Esposito, Iris Gordon, Juan Alberto Lopez Ulloa, Shaffi Mdala, Jacqueline Ramke, Jennifer R Evans, Matthew Burton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Biophotonics discovery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Covadonga BascaranLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Covadonga.bascaran@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5662-3325
Nyawira MwangiLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Fabrizio D'EspositoThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.
Iris GordonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Juan Alberto Lopez UlloaCentro Mexicano de Salud Visual Preventiva, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
Shaffi MdalaQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jacqueline RamkeLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jennifer R EvansLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Matthew BurtonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBKenya Medical Training College · KEQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital · MW

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy is the most common ocular complication of diabetes and a cause of vision loss in adults. Diabetic retinopathy screening leading to early identification of the disease followed by timely treatment, can prevent vision loss in people living with diabetes. A key barrier to the implementation of screening services in low- and middle-income countries is the low number of ophthalmologists per million population. Interventions that shift screening to non-ophthalmology cadres have been implemented in programmes in low- and middle-income countries and are routinely used in high-income countries. The aim of this rapid review is to summarise the published literature reporting the effectiveness of task-shifting interventions for the detection of diabetic retinopathy by non-ophthalmologists in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe will search MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and Cochrane Register of Studies for studies reporting task-shifting interventions for diabetic retinopathy detection. The review will include studies published in the last 10 years in the English language. We will include any interventional or observational comparative study measuring outcomes in terms of participation or access to diabetic retinopathy detection services (uptake) and quality of diabetic retinopathy detection services (detection, severity, diagnostic accuracy). For included studies, cost-effectiveness of the task-shifting intervention will also be presented. Two reviewers will screen search results independently. The risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be carried out by one reviewer with verification of 10% of the papers by a second reviewer. The results will be synthesised narratively. DISCUSSION: Differences in health systems organization, structure and resources will determine the need and success of task-shifting interventions for DR screening. The review will examine how these interventions have been used and/or tested in LMICs. The results will be of interest to policy makers and programme managers tasked with designing and implementing services to prevent and manage diabetes and its complications in similar settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF: https://osf.io/dfhg6/ .

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyAdultDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthHumansIncomeMass ScreeningSystematic Reviews as TopicDiabetic retinopathyEffectivenessLow- and middle-income countriesTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID33390182
PMCPMC7780379
OpenAlexW3120215883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.