Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392174›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature.

Antonietta Rosa Silini, Roberta Di Pietro, Ingrid Lang-Olip, Francesco Alviano, Asmita Banerjee, Mariangela Basile, Veronika Borutinskaite, Günther Eissner, Alexandra Gellhaus, Bernd Giebel and 17 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The human placenta development and anatomy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Antonietta Rosa SiliniCentro di Ricerca E. Menni, Fondazione Poliambulanza-Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Roberta Di PietroDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Ingrid Lang-OlipDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Francesco AlvianoDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Asmita BanerjeeLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Mariangela BasileDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Veronika BorutinskaiteDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Günther EissnerSystems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alexandra GellhausDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bernd GiebelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Yong-Can HuangShenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Orthopaedic Regenerative Technologies, Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Aleksandar JanevInstitute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mateja Erdani KreftInstitute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nadja KupperDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ana Clara Abadía-MolinaInstituto de Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Enrique G OlivaresInstituto de Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Assunta PandolfiStemTeCh Group, G. d'Annunzio Foundation, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Andrea PapaitCentro di Ricerca E. Menni, Fondazione Poliambulanza-Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Michela PozzobonStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Fondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padua, Italy.
Carmen Ruiz-RuizInstituto de Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Olga SoritauThe Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta", Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sergiu SusmanDepartment of Morphological Sciences-Histology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dariusz SzukiewiczDepartment of General and Experimental Pathology with Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CEPT), Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Adelheid WeidingerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Susanne WolbankLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Berthold HuppertzDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ornella ParoliniDepartment of Life Science and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF DOC 31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in the understanding of the biology of perinatal tissues has contributed to the breakthrough revelation of the therapeutic effects of perinatal derivatives (PnD), namely birth-associated tissues, cells, and secreted factors. The significant knowledge acquired in the past two decades, along with the increasing interest in perinatal derivatives, fuels an urgent need for the precise identification of PnD and the establishment of updated consensus criteria policies for their characterization. The aim of this review is not to go into detail on preclinical or clinical trials, but rather we address specific issues that are relevant for the definition/characterization of perinatal cells, starting from an understanding of the development of the human placenta, its structure, and the different cell populations that can be isolated from the different perinatal tissues. We describe where the cells are located within the placenta and their cell morphology and phenotype. We also propose nomenclature for the cell populations and derivatives discussed herein. This review is a joint effort from the COST SPRINT Action (CA17116), which broadly aims at approaching consensus for different aspects of PnD research, such as providing inputs for future standards for the processing and

Indexed as

cellsconsensus nomenclaturederivativesfetal annexesperinatalplacentatissues

Identifiers

PMID33392174
PMCPMC7773933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.