Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33393461›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Human complex exploration strategies are enriched by noradrenaline-modulated heuristics.

Magda Dubois, Johanna Habicht, Jochen Michely, Rani Moran, Ray J Dolan, Tobias U Hauser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Disentangling the roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during human decision-making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Computational Mechanisms of Information-Seeking in Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Magda DuboisMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-1855
Johanna HabichtMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.
Jochen MichelyMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.
Rani MoranMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7641-2402
Ray J DolanMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-761X
Tobias U HauserMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7997-8137
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

European Research Council 946055MRF_ MRF-160-0003-ELP-HAUSEWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098362/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 211155/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An exploration-exploitation trade-off, the arbitration between sampling a lesser-known against a known rich option, is thought to be solved using computationally demanding exploration algorithms. Given known limitations in human cognitive resources, we hypothesised the presence of additional cheaper strategies. We examined for such heuristics in choice behaviour where we show this involves a value-free random exploration, that ignores all prior knowledge, and a novelty exploration that targets novel options alone. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled drug study, assessing contributions of dopamine (400 mg amisulpride) and noradrenaline (40 mg propranolol), we show that value-free random exploration is attenuated under the influence of propranolol, but not under amisulpride. Our findings demonstrate that humans deploy distinct computationally cheap exploration strategies and that value-free random exploration is under noradrenergic control.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorExploratory BehaviorAdultDopamineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeuristicsHumansMaleNorepinephrineYoung AdultDopamineNorepinephrinedopamineexploration-exploitationhumanneurosciencenoradrenaline

Identifiers

PMID33393461
PMCPMC7815309
OpenAlexW3119012401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.