Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396256›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Global Genome Conformational Programming during Neuronal Development Is Associated with CTCF and Nuclear FGFR1-The Genome Archipelago Model.

Brandon Decker, Michal Liput, Hussam Abdellatif, Donald Yergeau, Yongho Bae, Josep M Jornet, Ewa K Stachowiak, Michal K Stachowiak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brandon DeckerWestern New York Stem Cell Culture and Analysis Center, Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3859-4337
Michal LiputWestern New York Stem Cell Culture and Analysis Center, Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Hussam AbdellatifDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Donald YergeauUB Genomics and Bioinformatics Core, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Yongho BaeWestern New York Stem Cell Culture and Analysis Center, Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1838-1652
Josep M JornetDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-1754
Ewa K StachowiakWestern New York Stem Cell Culture and Analysis Center, Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Michal K StachowiakWestern New York Stem Cell Culture and Analysis Center, Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3566-5232
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USNortheastern University · USMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

National Science Foundation CBET-1555720National Science Foundation CBET-1706050NYSTEM C026415NYSTEM C026714Patrick P. Lee Foundation Graduate Student Fellowships
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the development of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) to neuronal committed cells (NCC), coordinated changes in the expression of 2851 genes take place, mediated by the nuclear form of FGFR1. In this paper, widespread differences are demonstrated in the ESC and NCC inter- and intra-chromosomal interactions, chromatin looping, the formation of CTCF- and nFGFR1-linked Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) on a genome-wide scale and in exemplary HoxA-D loci. The analysis centered on HoxA cluster shows that blocking FGFR1 disrupts the loop formation. FGFR1 binding and genome locales are predictive of the genome interactions; likewise, chromatin interactions along with nFGFR1 binding are predictive of the genome function and correlate with genome regulatory attributes and gene expression. This study advances a topologically integrated genome archipelago model that undergoes structural transformations through the formation of nFGFR1-associated TADs. The makeover of the TAD islands serves to recruit distinct ontogenic programs during the development of the ESC to NCC.

Indexed as

GenomeNeurogenesisAnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell DifferentiationCell NucleusChromatinChromosomesEmbryonic Stem CellsMiceMolecular ConformationReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1CCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinCtcf protein, mouseFgfr1 protein, mouseReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1chromatin structureembryonic stem cellsFGFR1HoxAneuronal committed cells

Identifiers

PMID33396256
PMCPMC7795191
OpenAlexW3115273068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.