Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397927›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Humanizing the yeast origin recognition complex.

Clare S K Lee, Ming Fung Cheung, Jinsen Li, Yongqian Zhao, Wai Hei Lam, Vincy Ho, Remo Rohs, Yuanliang Zhai, Danny Leung, Bik-Kwoon Tye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome sequence assembly and annotation ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Compact Origins and Where to Find Them: ORC's Guide to Genome-Wide Licensing.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. DNA bending mediated by ORC is essential for replication licensing in budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Four decades of Eukaryotic DNA replication: From yeast genetics to high-resolution cryo-EM structures of the replisome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Clare S K LeeSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-0729-0376
Ming Fung CheungCenter for Epigenomics Research, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-3190
Jinsen LiQuantitative and Computational Biology, Departments of Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Physics & Astronomy, and Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Yongqian ZhaoDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.
Wai Hei LamSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong.
Vincy HoCenter for Epigenomics Research, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.
Remo RohsQuantitative and Computational Biology, Departments of Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Physics & Astronomy, and Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-1884
Yuanliang ZhaiSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong. zhai@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-8897-6416
Danny LeungCenter for Epigenomics Research, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong. dcyleung@ust.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-894X
Bik-Kwoon TyeDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong. biktye@ust.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-0216
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Quantitative Modeling of Transcription Factor-DNA BindingR35GM130376 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Remo Rohs · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) is an evolutionarily conserved six-subunit protein complex that binds specific sites at many locations to coordinately replicate the entire eukaryote genome. Though highly conserved in structure, ORC's selectivity for replication origins has diverged tremendously between yeasts and humans to adapt to vastly different life cycles. In this work, we demonstrate that the selectivity determinant of ORC for DNA binding lies in a 19-amino acid insertion helix in the Orc4 subunit, which is present in yeast but absent in human. Removal of this motif from Orc4 transforms the yeast ORC, which selects origins based on base-specific binding at defined locations, into one whose selectivity is dictated by chromatin landscape and afforded with plasticity, as reported for human. Notably, the altered yeast ORC has acquired an affinity for regions near transcriptional start sites (TSSs), which the human ORC also favors.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBinding SitesDNA, FungalG2 PhaseGenome, FungalHumansModels, GeneticMutationNucleosomesNucleotide MotifsOrigin Recognition ComplexSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseStochastic ProcessesDNA, FungalNucleosomesOrigin Recognition ComplexSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33397927
PMCPMC7782691
OpenAlexW3118761773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.