Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33399962›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2021

Light at night reduces digestive efficiency of developing birds: an experiment with king quail.

Tuul Sepp, Emily Webb, Richard K Simpson, Mathieu Giraudeau, Kevin J McGraw, Pierce Hutton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Tuul SeppDepartment of Zoology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014, Tartu, Estonia. tuul.sepp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7069
Emily WebbSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Richard K SimpsonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Mathieu GiraudeauSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Kevin J McGrawSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Pierce HuttonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Arizona State University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur IUT34-8Eesti Teadusagentuur PSG458Horizon 2020 701747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) exposes animals to a novel environmental stimulus, one that is generally thought to be maladaptive. ALAN-related health problems have received little attention in non-model species, and we generally know little about the nutritional-physiological impacts of ALAN, especially in young animals. Here, we use a novel application of the acid steatocrit method to experimentally assess changes in digestive efficiency of growing king quail (Excalfactoria chinensis) in response to ALAN. Two weeks after hatching, quail were split into two groups (n = 20-21 per group): overnight-light-treated vs. overnight-dark-treated. When the chicks were 3 weeks old, the experimental group was exposed to weak blue light (ca. 0.3 lux) throughout the entire night for 6 consecutive weeks, until all the chicks had achieved sexual maturation. Fecal samples for assessing digestive efficiency were collected every week. We found that digestive efficiency of quail was reduced by ALAN at two time points from weeks 4 to 9 after hatching (quail reach adulthood by week 9). The negative effect of ALAN on digestion coincided with the period of fastest skeletal growth, which suggests that ALAN may reduce digestive efficiency when energetic demands of growth are at their highest. Interestingly, growth rate was not influenced by ALAN. This suggests that either the negative physiological impacts of ALAN may be concealed when food is provided ad libitum, the observed changes in digestive efficiency were too small to affect growth or condition, or that ALAN-exposed birds had reduced energy expenditure. Our results illustrate that the health impacts of ALAN on wild animals should not be restricted to traditional markers like body mass or growth rate, but instead on a wide array of integrated physiological traits.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsDigestionEnvironmental PollutionQuailAvianDevelopmentDigestionExcalfactoria chinensisLight pollutionSteatocrit

Identifiers

PMID33399962
OpenAlexW3119859420

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.