Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410107›Full record

SynthesisNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2021

What Animal Models Can Tell Us About Long-Term Psychiatric Symptoms in Sepsis Survivors: a Systematic Review.

Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Gabriela Ferreira de Medeiros, Monique Michels, Aurélien Mazeraud, Fernando Augusto Bozza, Cristiane Ritter, Tarek Sharshar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Animal models of delirium: a narrative review.Translational psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Skewing cPLAScience signaling · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neurochemical effects of sepsis on the brain.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felipe Dal-Pizzol *Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, 88806-000, Criciúma, Brazil. fdpizzol@gmail.com.
Gabriela Ferreira de Medeiros *Laboratoire de Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France.
Monique MichelsLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, 88806-000, Criciúma, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-1976
Aurélien MazeraudLaboratory of Experimental Neuropathology, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France.
Fernando Augusto BozzaLaboratório de Medicina Intensiva, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), 21040-360, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cristiane RitterLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, 88806-000, Criciúma, Brazil.
Tarek SharsharLaboratoire de Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower sepsis mortality rates imply that more patients are discharged from the hospital, but sepsis survivors often experience sequelae, such as functional disability, cognitive impairment, and psychiatric morbidity. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying these long-term disabilities are not fully understood. Considering the extensive use of animal models in the study of the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders, it seems adopting this approach to improve our knowledge of postseptic psychiatric symptoms is a logical approach. With the purpose of gathering and summarizing the main findings of studies using animal models of sepsis-induced psychiatric symptoms, we performed a systematic review of the literature on this topic. Thus, 140 references were reviewed, and most of the published studies suggested a time-dependent recovery from behavior alterations, despite the fact that some molecular alterations persist in the brain. This review reveals that animal models can be used to understand the mechanisms that underlie anxiety and depression in animals recovering from sepsis.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBrainMental DisordersSepsisSepsis-Associated EncephalopathySurvivorsAnhedoniaAnimalsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCritical IllnessDepressionDepressive DisorderDisease Models, AnimalEscape ReactionExploratory Behavioranimal modelsanxietydepressionlong-term sequelaepsychiatric symptomsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID33410107
PMCPMC8423874
OpenAlexW3119827058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.