Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411010›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.

L Iconaru, M Moreau, F Baleanu, V Kinnard, A Charles, A Mugisha, M Surquin, F Benoit, R Karmali, M Paesmans and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Osteoporosis: Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Osteoporosis: Spotlight on current approaches to pharmacological treatment.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023
    Review
  10. Selection for treatment of patients at high risk of fracture by the short versus long term prediction models - data from the Belgian FRISBEE cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Short time horizons for fracture prediction tools: time for a rethink.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L IconaruDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium. laura_iconaru@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-9324
M MoreauData Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
F BaleanuDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
V KinnardDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
A CharlesLaboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
A MugishaDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
M SurquinDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
F BenoitDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
R KarmaliDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
M PaesmansData Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
J J BodyDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4, Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
P BergmannLaboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple factors increase the risk of an imminent fracture, including a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and the fracture site. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate treatment.

introductionThe risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is maximal during the first 2 years following an incident fracture. In this prospective cohort study, we looked at the incidence of recurrent fractures within 2 years after a first incident fracture and we assessed independent clinical risk factors (CRFs) increasing this imminent fracture risk.

methodsA total of 3560 postmenopausal women recruited from 2007 to 2013 were surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures. We identified patients who sustained a fracture during the first 2 years following a first incident fragility fracture. We quantified the risk of a new fracture and assessed independent CRFs, associated with an imminent fracture at various sites.

resultsA recent fracture was a significant CRF for an imminent fracture (OR (95% CI): 3.7 (2.4-5.7) [p < 0.0001]). The incidence of an imminent fracture was higher in subjects above 80 years (p < 0.001). Other CRFs highly predictive in a multivariate analysis were osteoporosis diagnosis (p < 0.01), a central fracture as the index fracture (p < 0.01), and the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.05), with likelihood ratios of 1.9, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively. An imminent fracture was better predicted by a central fracture (p < 0.01) than by a major osteoporotic fracture. The hazard ratio was the highest for a central fracture.

conclusionIn patients with a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and fracture site were associated with an imminent fracture risk. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate and most appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsClinical risk factorsImminent fracture

Identifiers

PMID33411010
OpenAlexW3118511944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.