Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413342›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Understanding the clinical reasoning processes involved in the management of multimorbidity in an ambulatory setting: study protocol of a stimulated recall research.

M-C Audétat, S Cairo Notari, J Sader, C Ritz, T Fassier, J M Sommer, M Nendaz, N Caire-Fon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M-C AudétatPrimary Care Institut (iuMFE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU 5-6, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. marie-claude.audetat@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-2214
S Cairo NotariPrimary Care Institut (iuMFE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU 5-6, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
J SaderUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
C RitzPrimary Care Institut (iuMFE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU 5-6, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
T FassierUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J M SommerPrimary Care Institut (iuMFE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU 5-6, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
M NendazUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
N Caire-FonDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care physicians are at the very heart of managing patients suffering from multimorbidity. However, several studies have highlighted that some physicians feel ill-equipped to manage these kinds of complex clinical situations. Few studies are available on the clinical reasoning processes at play during the long-term management and follow-up of patients suffering from multimorbidity. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding on how the clinical reasoning of primary care physicians is affected during follow-up consultations with these patients.

methodsA qualitative research project based on semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in an ambulatory setting will be carried out, using the video stimulated recall interview method. Participants will be filmed in their work environment during a standard consultation with a patient suffering from multimorbidity using a "button camera" (small camera) which will be pinned to their white coat. The recording will be used in a following semi-structured interview with physicians and the research team to instigate a stimulated recall. Stimulated recall is a research method that allows the investigation of cognitive processes by inviting participants to recall their concurrent thinking during an event when prompted by a video sequence recall. During this interview, participants will be prompted by different video sequence and asked to discuss them; the aim will be to encourage them to make their clinical reasoning processes explicit. Fifteen to twenty interviews are planned to reach data saturation. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and data will be analysed according to a standard content analysis, using deductive and inductive approaches.

conclusionStudy results will contribute to the scientific community's overall understanding of clinical reasoning. This will subsequently allow future generation of primary care physicians to have access to more adequate trainings to manage patients suffering from multimorbidity in their practice. As a result, this will improve the quality of the patient's care and treatments.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPhysicians, Primary CareClinical ReasoningHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationAmbulatory settingClinical reasoningMultimorbidityPrimary careQualitative studyStimulated recallStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID33413342
PMCPMC7792096

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.