Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2021
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04421274 (Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transfer in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transfer in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Muticentre Trial
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary Mesenchymal Stem Cell Administration in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2026Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy & safety of stem cell therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review & meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Mid- to long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Transient Fever: The Sole Treatment-Related Adverse Event Associated with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Solid Clues from the Real World.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Comparing the effect of bone marrow mono-nuclear cells with mesenchymal stem cells after acute myocardial infarction on improvement of left ventricular function: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on cardiac function and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.Cell transplantationPooled it
- Harnessing Lessons from Gel-Based and Advanced Biomaterial Therapeutics to Enable Direct Cellular Reprogramming.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Characteristics between porcine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Article
- Stem Cell Therapy Approaches for Ischemia: Assessing Current Innovations and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Unraveling the Complex Cellular Repair Mechanisms Following Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in diseases.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Navigating mesenchymal stem cells doses and delivery routes in heart disease trials: A comprehensive overview.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Stem Cell Therapy for Myocardial Infarction Recovery: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Enhanced human adipose-derived stem cells with VEGFA and bFGF mRNA promote stable vascular regeneration and improve cardiac function following myocardial infarction.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- ELABELA promotes the migration and homing of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to myocardial injury sites through the ERK1/2/miR-299a-5p/Exo70 pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Bibliometrics of trends in global research on the roles of stem cells in myocardial fibrosis therapy.World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Tregs delivered post-myocardial infarction adopt an injury-specific phenotype promoting cardiac repair via macrophages in mice.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Exploring Cutting-Edge Approaches to Potentiate Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Exosome Therapy for Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC) transplantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
methodsIn this randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, patients with STEMI (aged 39-76 years) were enrolled at 6 centers in Beijing (The People's Liberation Army Navy General Hospital, Beijing Armed Police General Hospital, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing Huaxin Hospital, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital West Hospital). All patients underwent optimum medical treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to BM-MSC group or control group. The primary endpoint was the change of myocardial viability at the 6th month's follow-up and left ventricular (LV) function at the 12th month's follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of cardiovascular event, total mortality, and adverse event during the 12 months' follow-up. The myocardial viability assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was used to assess LV function. All patients underwent dynamic ECG and laboratory evaluations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrails.gov, number NCT04421274.
resultsBetween March 2008 and July 2010, 43 patients who had underwent optimum medical treatment and successful percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to BM-MSC group (n = 21) or control group (n = 22) and followed-up for 12 months. At the 6th month's follow-up, there was no significant improvement in myocardial activity in the BM-MSC group before and after transplantation. Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the change of myocardial perfusion defect index (p = 0.37) and myocardial metabolic defect index (p = 0.90). The LVEF increased from baseline to 12 months in the BM-MSC group and control group (mean baseline-adjusted BM-MSC treatment differences in LVEF 4.8% (SD 9.0) and mean baseline-adjusted control group treatment differences in LVEF 5.8% (SD 6.04)). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the change of the LVEF (p = 0.23). We noticed that during the 12 months' follow-up, except for one death and one coronary microvascular embolism in the BM-MSC group, no other events occurred and alanine transaminase (ALT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in BM-MSC group were significantly lower than that in the control group.
conclusionsThe present study may have many methodological limitations, and within those limitations, we did not identify that intracoronary transfer of autologous BM-MSCs could largely promote the recovery of LV function and myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.