Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33414823›Full record

SynthesisNeural plasticity2020

Effects of Physical Exercise on Neuroplasticity and Brain Function: A Systematic Review in Human and Animal Studies.

Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes, Tayrine Figueira Ordônio, Gabriela Carvalho Jurema Santos, Lucas Eduardo R Santos, Camila Tenório Calazans, Dayane Aparecida Gomes, Tony Meireles Santos

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neural plasticity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matheus Santos de Sousa FernandesNeuropsquiatry and Behavior Science Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1066-9176
Tayrine Figueira OrdônioLaboratório de Imunopatologia Keizo Asami-LIKA, University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Gabriela Carvalho Jurema SantosAcademic Center of Vitoria de Santo Antão, Federal University of Pernambuco, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-5049
Lucas Eduardo R SantosNeuropsquiatry and Behavior Science Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-1398
Camila Tenório CalazansSchool of Physical Education, University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Dayane Aparecida GomesNeuropsquiatry and Behavior Science Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7288-1829
Tony Meireles SantosNeuropsquiatry and Behavior Science Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5242-0117
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical exercise (PE) has been associated with increase neuroplasticity, neurotrophic factors, and improvements in brain function. Objective: To evaluate the effects of different PE protocols on neuroplasticity components and brain function in a human and animal model. Methods: We conducted a systematic review process from November 2019 to January 2020 of the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, LILACS, and Scopus. A keyword combination referring to PE and neuroplasticity was included as part of a more thorough search process. From an initial number of 20,782 original articles, after reading the titles and abstracts, twenty-one original articles were included. Two investigators evaluated the abstract, the data of the study, the design, the sample size, the participant characteristics, and the PE protocol. Results: PE increases neuroplasticity via neurotrophic factors (BDNF, GDNF, and NGF) and receptor (TrkB and P75NTR) production providing improvements in neuroplasticity, and cognitive function (learning and memory) in human and animal models. Conclusion: PE was effective for increasing the production of neurotrophic factors, cell growth, and proliferation, as well as for improving brain functionality.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCognitionExerciseHumansLearningMemoryNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID33414823
PMCPMC7752270
OpenAlexW3112132995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.