Evidence mapPaperPMID 33416501Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2021

Effect of Interactive eHealth Interventions on Improving Medication Adherence in Adults With Long-Term Medication: Systematic Review.

Bart P H Pouls, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Charlotte L Bekker, Annemiek J Linn, Hein A W van Onzenoort, Marcia Vervloet, Sandra van Dulmen, Bart J F van den Bemt

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bart P H PoulsDepartment of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5715-1668
Johanna E VriezekolkDepartment of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-8663
Charlotte L BekkerDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-4409
Annemiek J LinnAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam,, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0912-3712
Hein A W van OnzenoortDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3272-2898
Marcia VervloetNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-9814
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-7544
Bart J F van den BemtDepartment of Rheumatology Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-9514
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication nonadherence leads to suboptimal treatment outcomes, making it a major priority in health care. eHealth provides an opportunity to offer medication adherence interventions with minimal effort from health care providers whose time and resources are limited.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review is twofold: (1) to evaluate effectiveness of recently developed and tested interactive eHealth (including mHealth) interventions on medication adherence in adult patients using long-term medication and (2) to describe strategies among effective interventions.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2014 to July 2019 as well as reference lists and citations of included articles. Eligible studies fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial with a usual care control group; (2) a total sample size of at least 50 adult patients using long-term medication; (3) applying an interactive eHealth intervention aimed at the patient or patient's caregiver; and (4) medication adherence as primary outcome. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Selection and quality assessment of studies were performed by 2 researchers (BP and BvdB or JV) independently. A best evidence synthesis was performed according to the Cochrane Back Review Group.

resultsOf the 9047 records screened, 22 randomized clinical trials were included reporting on 29 interventions. Most (21/29, 72%) interventions specified using a (mobile) phone for calling, SMS text messaging, or mobile apps. A majority of all interactive interventions (17/29) had a statistically significant effect on medication adherence (P<.05). Of these interventions, 9 had at least a small effect size (Cohen d ≥ 0.2) and 3 showed strong odds for becoming adherent in the intervention group (odds ratio > 2.0). Our best evidence synthesis provided strong evidence for a positive effect of interventions using SMS text messages or interactive voice response, mobile app, and calls as mode of providing adherence tele-feedback. Intervention strategies "to teach medication management skills," "to improve health care quality by coordinating medication adherence care between professionals," and "to facilitate communication or decision making between patients and health care providers" also showed strong evidence for a positive effect.

conclusionsOverall, this review supports the hypothesis that interactive eHealth interventions can be effective in improving medication adherence. Intervention strategies that improve patients' treatment involvement and their medication management skills are most promising and should be considered for implementation in practice.

Indexed as

HumansMedication AdherenceMobile ApplicationsRisk AssessmentTelemedicineeHealthinterventionslong-term conditionsmedication adherencemHealth

Identifiers

PMID33416501
PMCPMC7822716
OpenAlexW3118545579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.