ArticlePloS one2021
Supervised machine learning for automated classification of human Wharton's Jelly cells and mechanosensory hair cells.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering and gene therapy strategies offer new ways to repair permanent damage to mechanosensory hair cells (MHCs) by differentiating human Wharton's Jelly cells (HWJCs). Conventionally, these strategies require the classification of each cell as differentiated or undifferentiated. Automated classification tools, however, may serve as a novel method to rapidly classify these cells. In this paper, images from previous work, where HWJCs were differentiated into MHC-like cells, were examined. Various cell features were extracted from these images, and those which were pertinent to classification were identified. Different machine learning models were then developed, some using all extracted data and some using only certain features. To evaluate model performance, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was primarily used. This paper found that limiting algorithms to certain features consistently improved performance. The top performing model, a voting classifier model consisting of two logistic regressions, a support vector machine, and a random forest classifier, obtained an AUC of 0.9638. Ultimately, this paper illustrates the viability of a novel machine learning pipeline to automate the classification of undifferentiated and differentiated cells. In the future, this research could aid in automated strategies that determine the viability of MHC-like cells after differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.