SynthesisNeuropsychology review2021
Neuropsychological Assessment and Screening in Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Anthocyanins on Cognition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Studies in Cognitively Impaired and Healthy Adults.Current nutrition reports · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and Latent Profiles of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Heart Failure: A Secondary Data Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Trajectory of cognitive decline before and after incident heart failure among older adults: A 20-Year, population-based, prospective cohort study.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Cognitive Safety and Outcomes of Pharmacological Management in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- VasCog Screen test: sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in patients who had a stroke or with heart failure.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- Cognitive impairment in young and middle-aged patients with acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Review
- Heart failure causally affects the brain cortical structure: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Neuropsychiatric disorders in patients with heart failure: not to be ignored.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Cognitive Dysfunction in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology and Implications for Patient Management.Current heart failure reports · 2022Review
- Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure-A Review.Biology · 2022Review
- Impact and Implications of Neurocognitive Dysfunction in the Management of Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of neuropsychological changes secondary to heart failure have been documented in the literature. However, what remains unclear are which neuropsychological abilities are the most impacted by heart failure and what tests have the sensitivity to measure that impact. Eight databases were searched for articles that examined the neuropsychological functioning of patients with heart failure. Some of the inclusion criteria were articles had to have a heart failure group with a demographically comparable control group and standardized neuropsychological testing. Exclusion criteria included articles with a heart failure group with any other type of major organ failure, or comparisons that were between different classes of heart failure rather than between a heart failure and non-heart failure group. A total of 33 articles met the inclusion criteria (total heart failure sample n = 8900) and provided effect size data for 20 neuropsychological domains. All observed domain-level differences between heart failure and non-heart failure groups were statistically significant, except for simple motor functioning and confrontation naming. The greatest differences in performance were in executive functioning, global cognition, complex psychomotor speed, and verbal memory. The highest effect sizes came from Trail-Making Test-Part B, CAMCOG, Symbol Digit Modality Test, and California Verbal Learning Test. The neuropsychological patterns of heart failure suggested diffuse cognitive involvement, with higher-level processes being most affected. It is important to track neurocognition in this clinical population since neuropsychological impairment is prevalent, and screening measures appear to be reliable. Such screening and further assessment would inform future medical treatment and may improve patient care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.