Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33428163›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2021

Neuropsychological Assessment and Screening in Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Eric J Connors, Alexander O Hauson, Brianna D Barlet, Sharis Sarkissians, Nicholas P Stelmach, Alyssa D Walker, Natasha M Nemanim, Kristina L Greenwood, Nicholas J Chesher, Scott C Wollman and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Impact and Implications of Neurocognitive Dysfunction in the Management of Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric J ConnorsCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alexander O HausonCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA. alexanderhauson@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0596-6085
Brianna D BarletCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sharis SarkissiansCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicholas P StelmachCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alyssa D WalkerCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Natasha M NemanimCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kristina L GreenwoodSharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicholas J ChesherSharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA, USA.
Scott C WollmanCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kenneth E AllenCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Matthew G HallCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Christopher Flora-TostadoCalifornia School of Professional Psychology, Clinical Psychology PhD Program, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alliant International University · USSharp HealthCare Foundation · USNational Society of Professional Engineers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of neuropsychological changes secondary to heart failure have been documented in the literature. However, what remains unclear are which neuropsychological abilities are the most impacted by heart failure and what tests have the sensitivity to measure that impact. Eight databases were searched for articles that examined the neuropsychological functioning of patients with heart failure. Some of the inclusion criteria were articles had to have a heart failure group with a demographically comparable control group and standardized neuropsychological testing. Exclusion criteria included articles with a heart failure group with any other type of major organ failure, or comparisons that were between different classes of heart failure rather than between a heart failure and non-heart failure group. A total of 33 articles met the inclusion criteria (total heart failure sample n = 8900) and provided effect size data for 20 neuropsychological domains. All observed domain-level differences between heart failure and non-heart failure groups were statistically significant, except for simple motor functioning and confrontation naming. The greatest differences in performance were in executive functioning, global cognition, complex psychomotor speed, and verbal memory. The highest effect sizes came from Trail-Making Test-Part B, CAMCOG, Symbol Digit Modality Test, and California Verbal Learning Test. The neuropsychological patterns of heart failure suggested diffuse cognitive involvement, with higher-level processes being most affected. It is important to track neurocognition in this clinical population since neuropsychological impairment is prevalent, and screening measures appear to be reliable. Such screening and further assessment would inform future medical treatment and may improve patient care management.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersHeart FailureCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansNeuropsychological TestsExecutive functionGlobal cognitionHeart failureMemoryMeta-analysisNeuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID33428163
OpenAlexW3119077618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.