Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435889›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Congenital syphilis in East Baton Rouge parish, Louisiana: providers' and women's perspectives.

Emily W Harville, Gloria P Giarratano, Pierre Buekens, Eurydice Lang, Jennifer Wagman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Congenital Syphilis-An Illustrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily W HarvilleDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. eharvill@tulane.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0319-0922
Gloria P GiarratanoSchool of Nursing, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Pierre BuekensDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Eurydice LangSchool of Nursing, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Jennifer WagmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USTulane University · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
March of Dimes Foundation U380T000199-05-00NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital syphilis is completely preventable through screening and treatment, but rates have been rising in the United States. Certain areas are at particularly high risk. We aimed to assess attitudes, knowledge, and barriers around effective prevention of congenital syphilis among health care providers and community women potentially at risk.

methodsTwo parallel studies were conducted: in-depth interviews with health care providers and focus groups with community women in the area of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Each group was questioned about their experience in providing or seeking prenatal care, knowledge and attitudes about congenital syphilis, sources of information on testing and treatment, perceptions of risk, standards of and barriers to treatment. Results were transcribed into QSR NVivo V10, codes developed, and common themes identified and organized.

resultsProviders identified delays in testing and care, lack of follow-through with partner testing, and need for community connection for prevention, as major contributors to higher rates of congenital syphilis. Women identified difficulties in accessing Medicaid contributing to delayed start of prenatal care, lack of transportation for prenatal care, and lack of knowledge about testing and prevention for congenital syphilis.

conclusionsProviders and community members were in broad agreement about factors contributing to higher rates of congenital syphilis, although some aspects were emphasized more by one group or another. Evidence-based interventions, likely at multiple levels, need to be tested and implemented to eliminate congenital syphilis.

Indexed as

AwarenessHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTreponema pallidumAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHumansLouisianaMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisPrenatal careQualitative methodsSocial determinants of healthSyphilis, congenital

Identifiers

PMID33435889
PMCPMC7805072
OpenAlexW3118499107

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.