ReviewExperimental neurology2021
Clinical perspectives on ischemic stroke.
Review in Experimental neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-genomic Effect of Estradiol on the Neurovascular Unit and Possible Involvement in the Cerebral Vascular Accident.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Effect of Pei Yuan Tong Nao capsules on cerebral infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study of Koizumi and Longa Methods of Intraluminal Filament Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Rats: Early Corticosterone and Inflammatory Response in the Hippocampus and Frontal Cortex.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Role of Citicoline in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Ischemic Stroke, Glucocorticoids, and Remote Hippocampal Damage: A Translational Outlook and Implications for Modeling.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Treatments for acute stroke have improved over the past years, but have largely been limited to revascularization strategies. The topic of neuroprotection, or strategies to limit brain tissue damage or even reverse it, has remained elusive. Thus, the clinical mainstays for stroke management have focused on prevention. The lack of clinical translation of neuroprotective therapies which have shown promise in the laboratory may, in part, be due to a historic inattention to comorbidities suffered by a majority of stroke patients. With the advent of more stroke models that include one or more relevant comorbidities, it may be possible to identify effective treatments that may translate into new treatments at the clinical level. In the meantime, we review comorbidities in stroke patients, modification of stroke risk factors and available acute stroke treatments in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.