ReviewJournal of experimental pharmacology2021
Experimental Pharmacotherapy for COVID-19: The Latest Advances.
Review in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification of Drug Interaction Adverse Events in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Different Prognostic Role of Soluble PD-L1 in the Course of Severe and Non-Severe COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Long COVID: Clinical Framing, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Infections associated with SARS-CoV-2 exploited via nanoformulated photodynamic therapy.ADMET & DMPK · 2023Review
- Hematological- and Immunological-Related Biomarkers to Characterize Patients with COVID-19 from Other Viral Respiratory Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Rifampicin for COVID-19.World journal of virology · 2022Review
- Adverse Events Associated with BNT162b2 and AZD1222 Vaccines in the Real World: Surveillance Report in a Single Italian Vaccine Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- KL-6 in ARDS and COVID-19 Patients.Translational medicine @ UniSa · 2022Article
- An overview of the preclinical discovery and development of remdesivir for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2022Review
- Observational
- Review
- Environmental impact assessment of COVID-19 therapeutic solutions. A prospective analysis.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Effect of Tocilizumab in Reducing the Mortality Rate in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Beyond Vaccines: Clinical Status of Prospective COVID-19 Therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- PD-L1 Dysregulation in COVID-19 Patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Repurposing FDA-approved drugs to fight COVID-19 usingInformatics in medicine unlocked · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed like a shock wave in a completely unprepared world. Despite coronavirus infections were involved in previous epidemic outbreaks, no antiviral agent was developed for specific treatment. As a consequence, since the beginning of this pandemic, both repositioned and experimental drugs were used to treat the infected patients without evidence of clinical efficacy. Just based on experience coming from the use of antiviral agents to treat other viruses (eg, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir) and supposed antiviral or immunomodulatory activities of drugs with no approved antiviral indications (eg hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab), clinicians have faced the ongoing pandemic. Currently, after about 9 months from the COVID-19 spread, there is still no antiviral agent capable of ensuring the cure of this syndrome. Clinical trials are beginning to confirm the benefits of some drugs, while for other compounds, efficacy and safety have not yet been confirmed. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have denied or downsized the beneficial effects attributed to certain molecules, such as aminoquinolines, largely used in clinical practice at the beginning of COVID-19 spread. Conversely, at the same time, they have provided evidence for unexpected effectiveness of other agents that have been underutilized, such as steroids, which were not used in SARS treatment because of the threatened effect on viral replication. Evidence deriving from pathologic studies have demonstrated that the prothrombotic effects of SARS-CoV-2 can be prevented by heparin prophylaxis, underlining the need for personalized treatment for patients with severe disease. The main aim of this review is to synthesize the available information and evidence on both repositioned and experimental drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, focusing on the need to exercise caution on the use of unproven medical therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.