ReviewNutrients2021
An Update on Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Health.
Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates monotherapy or combination therapy for hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake on blood levels of omega-3s in people with chronic atherosclerotic disease: a systematic review.Nutrition reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in adjuvant treatments for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation and Coronary Heart Disease Risks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Omega-3 fatty acids effectively mitigate high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) biomarker of inflammation in acute myocardial infarction patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Fatty Acids and Their Roles in Cardiac Physiology and Pathology: Mechanistic and Interventional Studies.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Regulation of inflammation by omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutritional considerations for athletes with diabetes: optimizing performance and glycemic control.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Skeletal muscle disuse atrophy: protection by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.NFS journal · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Omega-3 and Omega-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation in Human Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Glycerophospholipid and Sphingosine- 1-phosphate Metabolism in Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Review
- The research progress and potential applications ofThe British journal of nutrition · 2025Review
- Exploring the Interplay Between Kidney Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Antioxidative Action of Alpha-Linolenic Acid during Its Gastroprotective Effect in an Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Injury Model.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2025Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in the potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ω-3) began in the 1940s and was amplified by a subsequent landmark trial showing reduced CV disease (CVD) risk following acute myocardial infarction. Since that time, however, much controversy has circulated due to discordant results among several studies and even meta-analyses. Then, in 2018, three more large, randomized trials were released-these too with discordant findings regarding the overall benefits of Ω-3 therapy. Interestingly, the trial that used a higher dose (4 g/day highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)) found a remarkable, statistically significant reduction in CVD events. It was proposed that insufficient Ω-3 dosing (<1 g/day EPA and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), as well as patients aggressively treated with multiple other effective medical therapies, may explain the conflicting results of Ω-3 therapy in controlled trials. We have thus reviewed the current evidence regarding Ω-3 and CV health, put forth potential reasoning for discrepant results in the literature, highlighted critical concepts such as measuring blood levels of Ω-3 with a dedicated Ω-3 index and addressed current recommendations as suggested by health care professional societies and recent significant scientific data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.