Trial reportScientific reports2021
Individual-fMRI-approaches reveal cerebellum and visual communities to be functionally connected in obsessive compulsive disorder.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring functional connectivity in large-scale brain networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review of EEG and fMRI studies.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Pooled it
- Pre-CBT resting-state connectivity and white matter integrity in OCD remission: A multimodal MRI study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- Longitudinal evaluation of common and unique brain-networks in variants of primary progressive aphasia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- The role of structural and functional parameters in designing pathology-specific tDCS protocols for primary progressive aphasia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Development of Composite Index in Psychiatry Clinical Trial.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Regional brain activity and connectivity associated with childhood trauma in drug-naive patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Behaviour-correlated profiles of cerebellar-cerebral functional connectivity observed in independent neurodevelopmental disorder cohorts.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- The cerebellum and anxiety.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Focality-Oriented Selection of Current Dose for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Altered Functional Connectivity Strength at Rest in Medication-Free Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Classification of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Distance Correlation on Resting-State Functional MRI Images.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is significant interest in understanding the pathophysiology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) using resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI). Previous studies acknowledge abnormalities within and beyond the fronto-striato-limbic circuit in OCD that require further clarifications. However, limited information could be inferred from the conventional way of investigating the functional connectivity differences between OCD and healthy controls. Here, we identified altered brain organization in patients with OCD by applying individual-based approaches to maximize the identification of underlying network-based features specific to the OCD group. rsfMRI of 20 patients with OCD and 22 controls were preprocessed, and individual-fMRI-subspace was derived for each subject within each group. We evaluated group differences in functional connectivity using individual-fMRI-subspace and established its advantage over conventional-fMRI methodology. We applied prediction-based approaches to highlight the group differences by evaluating the differences in functional connections that predicted the clinical scores (namely, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale). Then, we explored the brain network organization of both groups by estimating the subject-specific communities within each group. Lastly, we evaluated associations between the inter-individual variation of nodes in the communities to clinical measures using linear regression. Functional connectivity analysis using individual-fMRI-subspace detected 83 connections that were different between OCD and control groups, compared to none found using conventional-fMRI methodology. Connectome-based prediction analysis did not show significant overlap between the two groups in the functional connections that predicted the clinical scores. This suggests that the functional architecture in patients with OCD may be different compared to controls. Seven communities were found in both groups. Interestingly, within the OCD group but not controls, we observed functional connectivity between cerebellar and visual regions, and lack of connectivity between striato-limbic and frontal areas. Inter-individual variations in the community-size of these two communities were also associated with the OCI-R score (p < .005). Due to our small sample size, we further validated our results by (i) accounting for head motion, (ii) applying global signal regression (GSR) in data processing, and (iii) using an alternate atlas for parcellation. While the main results were consistently observed with accounting for head motion and using another atlas, the key findings were not reproduced with GSR application. The study demonstrated the existence of disconnectedness in fronto-striato-limbic community and connectedness between cerebellar and visual areas in OCD patients, which was also related to the clinical symptomatology of OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.