Evidence mapPaperPMID 33452138Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2021

The effectiveness of training strategies to improve healthcare provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries.

Alexander K Rowe, Samantha Y Rowe, David H Peters, Kathleen A Holloway, Dennis Ross-Degnan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Awareness of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) among healthcare professionals in Libya.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander K RoweDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA axr9@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-1383-4341
Samantha Y RoweCDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3729-579X
David H PetersDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-3444
Kathleen A HollowayInternational Institute of Health Management Research, Jaipur, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-6357
Dennis Ross-DegnanDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-1242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn low/middle-income countries (LMICs), training is often used to improve healthcare provider (HCP) performance. However, important questions remain about how well training works and the best ways to design training strategies. The objective of this study is to characterise the effectiveness of training strategies to improve HCP practices in LMICs and identify attributes associated with training effectiveness.

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of data from a systematic review on improving HCP performance. The review included controlled trials and interrupted time series, and outcomes measuring HCP practices (eg, percentage of patients correctly treated). Distributions of effect sizes (defined as percentage-point (%-point) changes) were described for each training strategy. To identify effective training attributes, we examined studies that directly compared training approaches and performed random-effects linear regression modelling.

resultsWe analysed data from 199 studies from 51 countries. For outcomes expressed as percentages, educational outreach visits (median effect size when compared with controls: 9.9 %-points; IQR: 4.3-20.6) tended to be somewhat more effective than in-service training (median: 7.3 %-points; IQR: 3.6-17.4), which seemed more effective than peer-to-peer training (4.0 %-points) and self-study (by 2.0-9.3 %-points). Mean effectiveness was greater (by 6.0-10.4 %-points) for training that incorporated clinical practice and training at HCPs' work site. Attributes with little or no effect were: training with computers, interactive methods or over multiple sessions; training duration; number of educational methods; distance training; trainers with pedagogical training and topic complexity. For lay HCPs, in-service training had no measurable effect. Evidence quality for all findings was low.

conclusionsAlthough additional research is needed, by characterising the effectiveness of training strategies and identifying attributes of effective training, decision-makers in LMICs can improve how these strategies are selected and implemented.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PersonnelHumansIncomePovertyhealth services research

Identifiers

PMID33452138
PMCPMC7813291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.