Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459720›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

Sexual Dimorphism in the 3xTg-AD Mouse Model and Its Impact on Pre-Clinical Research.

Jessica L Dennison, Natalie R Ricciardi, Ines Lohse, Claude-Henry Volmar, Claes Wahlestedt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica L DennisonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Natalie R RicciardiDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ines LohseDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Claude-Henry VolmarDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Claes WahlestedtDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female sex is a leading risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Sexual dimorphism in AD is gaining attention as clinical data show that women are not only more likely to develop AD but also to experience worse pathology and faster cognitive decline. Pre-clinical AD research in animal models often neglects to address sexual dimorphism in evaluation of behavioral or molecular characteristics and outcomes. This can compromise its translation to a clinical setting. The triple-transgenic AD mouse model (3xTg-AD) is a commonly used but unique AD model because it exhibits both amyloid and tau pathology, essential features of the human AD phenotype. Mounting evidence has revealed important sexually dimorphic characteristics of this animal model that have yet to be reviewed and thus, are often overlooked in studies using the 3xTg-AD model. In this review we conduct a thorough analysis of reports of sexual dimorphism in the 3xTg-AD model including findings of molecular, behavioral, and longevity-related sex differences in original research articles through August 2020. Importantly, we find results to be inconsistent, and that strain source and differing methodologies are major contributors to lack of consensus regarding traits of each sex. We first touch on the nature of sexual dimorphism in clinical AD, followed by a brief summary of sexual dimorphism in other major AD murine models before discussing the 3xTg-AD model in depth. We conclude by offering four suggestions to help unify pre-clinical mouse model AD research inspired by the NIH expectations for considering sex as a biological variable.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, TransgenicResearchtau ProteinsAmyloid beta-Protein Precursortau Proteins3xTg-ADAlzheimer’s diseasemouse modelssex as a biological variable (SABV)sexual dimorphismtriple transgenic

Identifiers

PMID33459720
PMCPMC8075398
OpenAlexW3119466275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.