ArticleAging2020
Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of pituitary adenomas reveals the impacts of copy number variations on gene expression and clinical prognosis among prolactin-secreting subtype.
Article in Aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell epigenetic landscape, microenvironment interactions, and gene regulatory modules of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.Cell systems · 2026Article
- A Bridge Too Far? Towards Medical Therapy for Clinically Nonfunctioning Pituitary Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- LncRNA 4933431K23Rik modulate microglial phenotype via inhibiting miR-10a-5p in spinal cord injury induced neuropathic pain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Expression assays of selected lncRNAs in non-functioning pituitary adenomas.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- From Genes to Therapy: Pituitary Adenomas in the Era of Precision Medicine.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- [Modern concepts of genetic and immunohistochemical features of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas].Problemy endokrinologii · 2023Article
- The function, mechanisms, and clinical applications of metformin: potential drug, unlimited potentials.Archives of pharmacal research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are slow growing and benign primary intracranial tumors that often cause occupying effects or endocrine symptoms. PAs can be classified into various subtypes according to hormone secretion. Although widespread transcriptional alterations that cause aberrant hormone secretion have been characterized, the impact of genomic variations on transcriptional alterations is unclear due to the rare occurrence of single-nucleotide variations in PA. In this study, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on 76 PA samples across three clinical subtypes (PRL-PAs; GH-PAs, and NFPAs); transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) of 54 samples across these subtypes was also conducted. Nine normal pituitary tissues were used as controls. Common and subtype-specific transcriptional alterations in PAs were identified. Strikingly, widespread genomic copy number amplifications were discovered for PRL-PAs, which are causally involved in transcriptomic changes in this subtype. Moreover, we found that the high copy number variations (CNVs) in PRL-PA cause increased prolactin production, drug resistance and proliferative capacity, potentially through key genes with copy number amplification and transcriptional activation, such as BCAT1. This study provides insight into how genomic CNVs affect the transcriptome and clinical outcomes of PRL-PA and sheds light on the development of potential therapeutics for aberrantly activated targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.