Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477172›Full record

ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2021

[Non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in primary care - a questionnaire study among general practitioners].

Paul Voigt, Paul Kairys, Anne Voigt, Thomas Frese

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul VoigtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Paul KairysInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Anne VoigtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease are cared for by general practitioners. Especially for Germany, the evidence of this topic is still very low. The aim of the survey was to estimate the perceived frequency of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in general practice, the use of diagnostics and therapy, used tools considering the professional background and experience of the responding general practitioners.

methodsA questionnaire was self-designed in the cooperation of several disciplines. 1130 general practitioners from Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt were randomly selected and the questionnaire was sent by post. Data were collected from June 2019 to July 2019.

resultsOf the 1,130 questionnaires sent, 372 returned analysable (response rate: 32.9 %). The prevalence of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease was estimated to be 6-15 %. 97 % of the general practitioners rated the adjustment of high blood pressure and diabetes mellitus as a high to very high priority. Concerning the diagnosis of proteinuria, the use of a urine dipstick test was stated by 60.8 % of the respondents and the requirement for an albumin/creatinine-ratio was stated by 22.6 %. Only a few differences could be revealed in the response behavior of the participating groups of doctors. Working experience is an important factor in choosing tools, especially guidelines.

conclusionsThe results showed that the doctors interviewed followed international recommendations for the care of patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. However, improvements in progression diagnostics are necessary and important. General practitioners and internal medicines working as general practitioners have a comparable level of competence in the primary medical care of the non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Significant differences were created by the professional experience of the doctors. KEY POINTS: · General practitioners estimate the prevalence of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in their practice at 6-15 %.. · Using the albumin/creatinine-ratio for proteinuria diagnostics is requested too rarely compared to the urine dipstick test.. · General practitioners, specialists in general medicine and internists working in general medicine have a comparable level of competence to treat patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease.. · Working experience is an important factor in choosing tools, especially guidelines..

Indexed as

General PractitionersPrimary Health CareFemaleHumansMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Renal Insufficiency, ChronicSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33477172
PMCPMC7972822
OpenAlexW3124831586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.