Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33477975›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Identification of Target Chicken Populations by Machine Learning Models Using the Minimum Number of SNPs.

Dongwon Seo, Sunghyun Cho, Prabuddha Manjula, Nuri Choi, Young-Kuk Kim, Yeong Jun Koh, Seung Hwan Lee, Hyung-Yong Kim, Jun Heon Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A web tool for the global identification of pig breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongwon SeoDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-7068
Sunghyun ChoDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Prabuddha ManjulaDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Nuri ChoiSELS Center, Division of Biotechnology, Advanced Institute of Environment and Bioscience, Chonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, Korea.
Young-Kuk KimBio-AI Convergence Research Center, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8329-9348
Yeong Jun KohBio-AI Convergence Research Center, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Seung Hwan LeeDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Hyung-Yong KimInsilicogen Inc., Yongin 16954, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2799-7379
Jun Heon LeeDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Chungnam National University · KRInsilicogen (South Korea) · KRJeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

Korea Institute Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries through the Golden Seed Project, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Dev 2013010-05-4-SB250, PJ0128202020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A marker combination capable of classifying a specific chicken population could improve commercial value by increasing consumer confidence with respect to the origin of the population. This would facilitate the protection of native genetic resources in the market of each country. In this study, a total of 283 samples from 20 lines, which consisted of Korean native chickens, commercial native chickens, and commercial broilers with a layer population, were analyzed to determine the optimal marker combination comprising the minimum number of markers, using a 600 k high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Machine learning algorithms, a genome-wide association study (GWAS), linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to distinguish a target (case) group for comparison with control chicken groups. In the processing of marker selection, a total of 47,303 SNPs were used for classifying chicken populations; 96 LD-pruned SNPs (50 SNPs per LD block) served as the best marker combination for target chicken classification. Moreover, 36, 44, and 8 SNPs were selected as the minimum numbers of markers by the AdaBoost (AB), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT) machine learning classification models, which had accuracy rates of 99.6%, 98.0%, and 97.9%, respectively. The selected marker combinations increased the genetic distance and fixation index (Fst) values between the case and control groups, and they reduced the number of genetic components required, confirming that efficient classification of the groups was possible by using a small number of marker sets. In a verification study including additional chicken breeds and samples (12 lines and 182 samples), the accuracy did not significantly change, and the target chicken group could be clearly distinguished from the other populations. The GWAS, PCA, and machine learning algorithms used in this study can be applied efficiently, to determine the optimal marker combination with the minimum number of markers that can distinguish the target population among a large number of SNP markers.

Indexed as

genome-wide association study (GWAS)linkage disequilibrium (LD)machine learningprincipal component analysis (PCA)single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID33477975
PMCPMC7835996
OpenAlexW3124917893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.