Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33478563›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study.

Alexa B Keeling, Mark Piitz, Jennifer A Semrau, Michael D Hill, Stephen H Scott, Sean P Dukelow

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04201613 (Robot-Enhanced Stroke Therapy Optimized Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04201613 naunknown statusnot on this map

Robot-Enhanced Stroke Therapy Optimized Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2019 to 2023Enrolled132ConditionsStrokeArmsRobotic exoskeleton, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. An integrated investigation of systemic and localized pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke and multimodal therapeutic strategies.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexa B KeelingHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mark PiitzDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jennifer A SemrauHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Michael D HillHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Stephen H ScottDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Sean P DukelowHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. spdukelo@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-981X

Funding

CIHR PJT-155915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic rehabilitation after stroke provides the potential to increase and carefully control dosage of therapy. Only a small number of studies, however, have examined robotic therapy in the first few weeks post-stroke. In this study we designed robotic upper extremity therapy tasks for the bilateral Kinarm Exoskeleton Lab and piloted them in individuals with subacute stroke. Pilot testing was focused mainly on the feasibility of implementing these new tasks, although we recorded a number of standardized outcome measures before and after training.

methodsOur team developed 9 robotic therapy tasks to incorporate feedback, intensity, challenge, and subject engagement as well as addressing both unimanual and bimanual arm activities. Subacute stroke participants were assigned to a robotic therapy (N = 9) or control group (N = 10) in a matched-group manner. The robotic therapy group completed 1-h of robotic therapy per day for 10 days in addition to standard therapy. The control group participated only in standard of care therapy. Clinical and robotic assessments were completed prior to and following the intervention. Clinical assessments included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Robotic assessments of upper limb sensorimotor function included a Visually Guided Reaching task and an Arm Position Matching task, among others. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare initial and final robotic therapy scores as well as pre- and post-clinical and robotic assessments.

resultsParticipants with subacute stroke (39.8 days post-stroke) completed the pilot study. Minimal adverse events occurred during the intervention and adding 1 h of robotic therapy was feasible. Clinical and robotic scores did not significantly differ between groups at baseline. Scores on the FMA UE, ARAT, FIM, and Visually Guided Reaching improved significantly in the robotic therapy group following completion of the robotic intervention. However, only FIM and Arm Position Match improved over the same time in the control group.

conclusionsThe Kinarm therapy tasks have the potential to improve outcomes in subacute stroke. Future studies are necessary to quantify the benefits of this robot-based therapy in a larger cohort.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04201613, Registered 17 December 2019-Retrospectively Registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201613 .

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceRoboticsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUpper ExtremityRobotic rehabilitationRoboticsStroke rehabilitationSubacute stroke

Identifiers

PMID33478563
PMCPMC7819212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.