Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33480182›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2021

Likelihood ratio statistics for gene set enrichment in Alzheimer's disease pathways.

Jordan Bryan, Arpita Mandan, Gauri Kamat, W Kirby Gottschalk, Alexandra Badea, Kendra J Adams, J Will Thompson, Carol A Colton, Sayan Mukherjee, Michael W Lutz and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan BryanDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Arpita MandanDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Gauri KamatDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
W Kirby GottschalkDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alexandra BadeaDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kendra J AdamsDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Will ThompsonDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carol A ColtonDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sayan MukherjeeDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Michael W LutzDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Duke University · USAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Sex and APOE genotype interact to alter immune regulated metabolism in ADRF1AG057895 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA, COLTON, CAROL ANNE · 2019 to 2019
$5.8M
Brain networks in mouse models of agingR01AG066184 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Sex and APOE genotype interact to alter immune regulated metabolism in ADR56AG057895 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, ALEXANDRA, COLTON, CAROL ANNE · 2017 to 2017
$1.1M
Shared genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic profiles between AD and PTSD: molecular insights into the heterogeneity of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimers DiseaseR56AG062302 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHIBA-FALEK, ORNIT, LUO, SHENG · 2018 to 2018
$788k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066184NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057895NIA NIH HHS R56 AG062302NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057895NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has revealed biological pathways with implications for disease neuropathology and pathophysiology. These pathway-level effects may also be mediated by individual characteristics or covariates such as age or sex. Evaluation of AD biological pathways in the context of interactions with these covariates is critical to the understanding of AD as well as the development of model systems used to study the disease.

methodsGene set enrichment methods are powerful tools used to interpret gene-level statistics at the level of biological pathways. We introduce a method for quantifying gene set enrichment using likelihood ratio-derived test statistics (gsLRT), which accounts for sample covariates like age and sex. We then use our method to test for age and sex interactions with protein expression levels in AD and to compare the pathway results between human and mouse species.

resultsOur method, based on nested logistic regressions is competitive with the existing standard for gene set testing in the context of linear models and complex experimental design. The gene sets we identify as having a significant association with AD-both with and without additional covariate interactions-are validated by previous studies. Differences between gsLRT results on mouse and human datasets are observed. DISCUSSION: Characterizing biological pathways involved in AD builds on the important work involving single gene drivers. Our gene set enrichment method finds pathways that are significantly related to AD while accounting for covariates that may be relevant to disease development. The method highlights commonalities and differences between human AD and mouse models, which may inform the development of higher fidelity models for the study of AD.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGene Expression RegulationModels, StatisticalAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiceSex FactorsAlzheimer's disease mouse model developmentBiostatisticsGene set analysisGenetics of Alzheimer's diseaseProteomics

Identifiers

PMID33480182
PMCPMC8044005
OpenAlexW3125479753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.