Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33480205›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2021

Validation of a New Screening Tool for Dementia: The Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living.

Jinse Park, Hojin Choi, Jea Won Jang, Jae Sung Lim, YoungSoon Yang, Chan Nyoung Lee, Kee Hyung Park

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinse ParkDepartment of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-5422
Hojin ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. chj@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-4423
Jea Won JangDepartment of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-530X
Jae Sung LimDepartment of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym Neurological Institute, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-2908
YoungSoon YangDepartment of Neurology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-2599
Chan Nyoung LeeDepartment of Neurology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1285-4658
Kee Hyung ParkDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-6679
Gachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHallym University · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRInje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KRKangwon National University Hospital · KRKorea University · KRVeterans Health Service Medical Center · KR

Funding

Eisai Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeScreening tests for dementia such as the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment are widely used, but there are drawbacks to their efficient use. There remains a need for a brief and easy method of assessing the activities of daily living (ADL) that can be administered to elderly individuals by healthcare workers. We have therefore developed a new scale named the Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living (SOC-ADL).

methodsWe developed the SOC-ADL scale as a team of experts engaged in caring for individuals with dementia. This scale comprises eight items and was designed based on the Korean instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL) scale and the Barthel activities of daily living scale (Barthel Index). The new scale was validated by enrolling 176 patients with cognitive dysfunction across 6 centers. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed. We assessed its concurrent validity by performing comparisons with the Korean-MMSE, Clinical Dementia Rating, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, K-IADL, and Barthel Index, and its criterion validity by performing comparisons between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We also used Cronbach's alpha to assess the interitem reliability. The appropriate cutoff values were determined by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves, including the areas underneath them.

resultsEFA extracted one factor and CFA revealed that all of the model fits exceeded the minimum acceptable criteria. The SOC-ADL scores were strongly correlated with those of the other tools for dementia and could be used to differentiate MCI from dementia. Cronbach's alpha values indicated that the results were reliable. The optimal cutoff value of the SOC-ADL for discriminating dementia from MCI was 3 points, which provided a sensitivity and specificity of 74.5% and 75.7%, respectively.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the SOC-ADL is a valid and reliable tool for differentiating dementia from MCI based on an assessment of ADL. This new tool can be used for screening ADL in elderly subjects who have difficulty communicating, and to increase the efficiency of dementia screening at the population level.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingdementiadiagnostic screening program

Identifiers

PMID33480205
PMCPMC7840314
OpenAlexW3125429887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.