Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33491759›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of oncology2021

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors from cancer to COVID‑19: A promising avenue for the treatment of patients with COVID‑19 (Review).

Silvia Vivarelli, Luca Falzone, Francesco Torino, Giuseppa Scandurra, Giulia Russo, Roberto Bordonaro, Francesco Pappalardo, Demetrios A Spandidos, Giuseppina Raciti, Massimo Libra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05102643 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine Delivered Intramuscularly Followed by Electroporation for COVID-19 in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05102643 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine Delivered Intramuscularly Followed by Electroporation for COVID-19 in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsCovid19ArmsSARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine, Matching placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia VivarelliSection of General Pathology, Clinics and Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Luca FalzoneEpidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione G. Pascale', I‑80131 Naples, Italy.
Francesco TorinoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, I‑00133 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppa ScandurraMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, I‑95126 Catania, Italy.
Giulia RussoDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Roberto BordonaroMedical Oncology Unit, Garibaldi Hospital, I‑95122 Catania, Italy.
Francesco PappalardoDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Giuseppina Raciti *Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Massimo Libra *Section of General Pathology, Clinics and Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITOspedale Garibaldi · ITUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus‑2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) poses a threat to human life worldwide. Since early March, 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19), characterized by an acute and often severe form of pneumonia, has been declared a pandemic. This has led to a boom in biomedical research studies at all stages of the pipeline, from the in vitro to the clinical phase. In line with this global effort, known drugs, currently used for the treatment of other pathologies, including antivirals, immunomodulating compounds and antibodies, are currently used off‑label for the treatment of COVID‑19, in association with the supportive standard care. Yet, no effective treatments have been identified. A new hope stems from medical oncology and relies on the use of immune‑checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In particular, amongst the ICIs, antibodies able to block the programmed death‑1 (PD‑1)/PD ligand-1 (PD‑L1) pathway have revealed a hidden potential. In fact, patients with severe and critical COVID‑19, even prior to the appearance of acute respiratory distress syndrome, exhibit lymphocytopenia and suffer from T‑cell exhaustion, which may lead to viral sepsis and an increased mortality rate. It has been observed that cancer patients, who usually are immunocompromised, may restore their anti‑tumoral immune response when treated with ICIs. Moreover, viral-infected mice and humans, exhibit a T‑cell exhaustion, which is also observed following SARS‑CoV‑2 infection. Importantly, when treated with anti‑PD‑1 and anti‑PD‑L1 antibodies, they restore their T‑cell competence and efficiently counteract the viral infection. Based on these observations, four clinical trials are currently open, to examine the efficacy of anti‑PD‑1 antibody administration to both cancer and non‑cancer individuals affected by COVID‑19. The results may prove the hypothesis that restoring exhausted T‑cells may be a winning strategy to beat SARS‑CoV‑2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntineoplastic AgentsCOVID-19Drug RepositioningHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsSARS-CoV-2Antineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsanti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodycancerCOVID-19immune-checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33491759
PMCPMC7864014
OpenAlexW3111140255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.