Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33494403›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Ensemble-AMPPred: Robust AMP Prediction and Recognition Using the Ensemble Learning Method with a New Hybrid Feature for Differentiating AMPs.

Supatcha Lertampaiporn, Tayvich Vorapreeda, Apiradee Hongsthong, Chinae Thammarongtham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tuna trimmingsCurrent research in food science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supatcha LertampaipornNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Biochemical Engineering and Systems Biology Research Group, National Science and Technology Development Agency, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Khun Thian Bangkok 10150, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-847X
Tayvich VorapreedaNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Biochemical Engineering and Systems Biology Research Group, National Science and Technology Development Agency, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Khun Thian Bangkok 10150, Thailand.
Apiradee HongsthongNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Biochemical Engineering and Systems Biology Research Group, National Science and Technology Development Agency, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Khun Thian Bangkok 10150, Thailand.
Chinae ThammarongthamNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Biochemical Engineering and Systems Biology Research Group, National Science and Technology Development Agency, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Khun Thian Bangkok 10150, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5834-4795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are natural peptides possessing antimicrobial activities. These peptides are important components of the innate immune system. They are found in various organisms. AMP screening and identification by experimental techniques are laborious and time-consuming tasks. Alternatively, computational methods based on machine learning have been developed to screen potential AMP candidates prior to experimental verification. Although various AMP prediction programs are available, there is still a need for improvement to reduce false positives (FPs) and to increase the predictive accuracy. In this work, several well-known single and ensemble machine learning approaches have been explored and evaluated based on balanced training datasets and two large testing datasets. We have demonstrated that the developed program with various predictive models has high performance in differentiating between AMPs and non-AMPs. Thus, we describe the development of a program for the prediction and recognition of AMPs using MaxProbVote, which is an ensemble model. Moreover, to increase prediction efficiency, the ensemble model was integrated with a new hybrid feature based on logistic regression. The ensemble model integrated with the hybrid feature can effectively increase the prediction sensitivity of the developed program called Ensemble-AMPPred, resulting in overall improvements in terms of both sensitivity and specificity compared to those of currently available programs.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticMachine LearningSoftwareAlgorithmsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAMP predictionantimicrobial peptidesheterogeneous ensemble machine learninglogistic regressionMaxProbVote

Identifiers

PMID33494403
PMCPMC7911732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.