Evidence mapPaperPMID 33494757Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Impact of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gian Loreto D'Alò, Franco De Crescenzo, Laura Amato, Fabio Cruciani, Marina Davoli, Francesca Fulceri, Silvia Minozzi, Zuzana Mitrova, Gian Paolo Morgano, Franco Nardocci and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Use of Psychotropic Medication in Iranian Children with Developmental Disabilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Gian Loreto D'Alò *Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy. gianloretod@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4125-2066
Franco De Crescenzo *Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Laura AmatoDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Fabio CrucianiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Francesca FulceriResearch Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Silvia MinozziDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Zuzana MitrovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Gian Paolo MorganoResearch Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Franco NardocciResearch Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Rosella SaulleDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Holger Jens SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Formerly Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics), McMaster GRADE Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Maria Luisa ScattoniResearch Coordination and Support Service, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
ISACA Guideline Working Group
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITAgenzia Regionale Parchi · ITRegional Health · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe net health benefit of using antipsychotics in children and adolescents with ASD is unclear. This review was performed to provide the evidence necessary to inform the Italian national guidelines for the management of ASD.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antipsychotics versus placebo for the treatment of ASD in children and adolescents. For efficacy, acceptability and safety we considered outcomes evaluated by the guideline panel critical and important for decision-making. Continuous outcomes were analyzed by using standardized mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous outcomes by calculating the risk ratio (RR), with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Data were analyzed using a random effects model. We used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias of included studies. Certainty in the evidence of effects was assessed according to the GRADE approach.

resultsWe included 21 RCTs with 1,309 participants, comparing antipsychotics to placebo. Antipsychotics were found effective on "restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors" (SMD - 0.21, 95% CI - 0.35 to - 0.07, moderate certainty), "hyperactivity, inattention, oppositional, disruptive behavior" (SMD - 0.67, 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.42, moderate certainty), "social communication, social interaction" (SMD - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.59 to - 0.16, moderate certainty), "emotional dysregulation/irritability" (SMD - 0.71, 95% CI - 0.98 to - 0.43, low certainty), "global functioning, global improvement" (SMD - 0.64, 95% CI - 0.96 to - 0.33, low certainty), "obsessions, compulsions" (SMD - 0.30, 95% CI - 0.55 to - 0.06, moderate certainty). Antipsychotics were not effective on "self-harm" (SMD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.58 to 0.30, very low certainty), "anxiety" (SMD - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.82 to 0.07, very low certainty). Antipsychotics were more acceptable in terms of dropout due to any cause (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, moderate certainty), but were less safe in terms of patients experiencing adverse events (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32, moderate certainty), and serious adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.43, low certainty).

conclusionsOur systematic review and meta-analysis found antipsychotics for children and adolescents with ASD more efficacious than placebo in reducing stereotypies, hyperactivity, irritability and obsessions, compulsions, and in increasing social communication and global functioning. Antipsychotics were also found to be more acceptable, but less safe than placebo.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntipsychotic AgentsAnxiety DisordersAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderChildHumansQuality of LifeAntipsychotic AgentsAdolescentsAntipsychoticsAutism spectrum disorderChildrenD2 blockersGuidelinesMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33494757
PMCPMC7831175
OpenAlexW3124883152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.