Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33495324›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Nascent fusion pore opening monitored at single-SNAREpin resolution.

Paul Heo, Jeff Coleman, Jean-Baptiste Fleury, James E Rothman, Frederic Pincet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Energetics, kinetics, and pathways of SNARE assembly in membrane fusion.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul HeoLaboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-326X
Jeff ColemanDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0003-0110-9289
Jean-Baptiste FleuryDepartment of Experimental Physics, Saarland University, Saarbruecken D-66123, Germany.
James E RothmanDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; james.rothman@yale.edu pincet@lps.ens.fr.
Frederic PincetLaboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, F-75005 Paris, France; james.rothman@yale.edu pincet@lps.ens.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-2157
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRYale University · USSaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vesicle fusion with a target membrane is a key event in cellular trafficking and ensures cargo transport within the cell and between cells. The formation of a protein complex, called SNAREpin, provides the energy necessary for the fusion process. In a three-dimensional microfluidic chip, we monitored the fusion of small vesicles with a suspended asymmetric lipid bilayer. Adding ion channels into the vesicles, our setup allows the observation of a single fusion event by electrophysiology with 10-μs precision. Intriguingly, we identified that small transient fusion pores of discrete sizes reversibly opened with a characteristic lifetime of ∼350 ms. The distribution of their apparent diameters displayed two peaks, at 0.4 ± 0.1 nm and 0.8 ± 0.2 nm. Varying the number of SNAREpins, we demonstrated that the first peak corresponds to fusion pores induced by a single SNAREpin and the second peak is associated with pores involving two SNAREpins acting simultaneously. The pore size fluctuations provide a direct estimate of the energy landscape of the pore. By extrapolation, the energy landscape for three SNAREpins does not exhibit any thermally significant energy barrier, showing that pores larger than 1.5 nm are spontaneously produced by three or more SNAREpins acting simultaneously, and expand indefinitely. Our results quantitatively explain why one SNAREpin is sufficient to open a fusion pore and more than three SNAREpins are required for cargo release. Finally, they also explain why a machinery that synchronizes three SNAREpins, or more, is mandatory to ensure fast neurotransmitter release during synaptic transmission.

Indexed as

Membrane FusionEnergy MetabolismSNARE ProteinsSNARE Proteinsmembrane fusionmetastable statesSNAREssuspended bilayer

Identifiers

PMID33495324
PMCPMC7865171
OpenAlexW3123168270

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.