ArticleAging2021
The roles of PARP-1 and XPD and their potential interplay in repairing bupivacaine-induced neuron oxidative DNA damage.
Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Structural, Biochemical, and Cellular Perspectives on the TFIIH Helicases XPB and XPD.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Targeting DNA Damage and Repair Pathways in Cerebral Ischemic Stroke: From Bench to Bedside.Translational stroke research · 2026Review
- Oxidative DNA Damage-induced PARP-1-mediated Autophagic Flux Disruption Contributes to Bupivacaine-induced Neurotoxicity During Pregnancy.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Article
- Apnea of prematurity induces short and long-term development-related transcriptional changes in the murine cerebellum.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- The DNA Repair Enzyme XPD Is Partially Regulated by PI3K/AKT Signaling in the Context of Bupivacaine-Mediated Neuronal DNA Damage.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bupivacaine has been widely used in clinical Anesthesia, but its neurotoxicity has been frequently reported, implicating cellular oxidative DNA damage as the major underlying mechanism. However, the mechanism underlying bupivacaine-induced oxidative DNA damage is unknown. We, thus, exposed SH-SY5Y cells to 1.5mM bupivacaine to induce neurotoxicity. Then, iTRAQ proteomic analysis was used to explore the repair of neuronal oxidative DNA damage. By analyzing the STRING version 11.0 database, the bioinformatics relationship between key repair enzymes was tracked. Subsequently, immunofluorescence co-localization and immunoprecipitation were used to investigate the interaction between key repair enzymes. The iTRAQ showed that Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP-1) from the base excision repair pathway participated closely in the repair of oxidative DNA damage induced by bupivacaine, and inhibition of PARP-1 expression significantly aggravated bupivacaine-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. Interestingly, this study showed that there were interactions and co-expression between PARP-1 and XPD (xeroderma pigmentosum D), another key protein of the nucleic acid excision repair pathway. After inhibiting XPD, PARP-1 expression was significantly reduced. However, simultaneous inhibition of both XPD and PARP-1 did not further increase DNA damage. It is concluded that PARP-1 may repair bupivacaine-induced oxidative DNA damage through XPD-mediated interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.