Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501760›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Clinical audit of adherence to hypertension treatment guideline and control rates in hospitals of different sizes in Thailand.

Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish, Supattra Srivanichakorn, Pattara Sanchaisuriya, Bang-On Thepthien, Dusida Tooprakai, Elisha Ngetich, Albertino Damasceno, Michael Hecht Olsen, James E Sharman and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Chaisiri AngkurawaranonDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-9164
Kanokporn PinyopornpanishDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-3834
Supattra SrivanichakornCommunity based Health Research and Development Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pattara SanchaisuriyaDepartment of Public Health Administration, Health Promotion, and Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Bang-On ThepthienASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.
Dusida TooprakaiDepartment of Social Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand.
Elisha NgetichNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Albertino DamascenoLancet Commission on Hypertension Group, London, UK.
Michael Hecht OlsenLancet Commission on Hypertension Group, London, UK.
James E SharmanLancet Commission on Hypertension Group, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-0811
Renu GargWorld Health Organization Country Office for Thailand, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THEduardo Mondlane University · MZKhon Kaen University · THLampang Hospital · THMahidol University · THNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBPraboromarajchanok Institute Ministry of Public Health · THUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Tasmania · AUWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Gates FoundationWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A clinical audit of hospitals in Thailand was conducted to assess compliance with the national hypertension treatment guidelines and determine hypertension control rates across facilities of different sizes. Stratified random sampling was used to select sixteen hospitals of different sizes from four provinces. These included community (<90 beds), large (90-120 beds), and provincial (>120 beds) hospitals. Among new cases, the audit determined whether (i) the recommended baseline laboratory assessment was completed, (ii) the initial choice of medication was appropriate based on the patient's cardiovascular risk, and (iii) patients received medication adjustments when indicated. The hypertension control rates at six months and at the last visit were recorded. Among the 1406 patients, about 75% had their baseline glucose and kidney function assessed. Nearly 30% (n = 425/1406) of patients were indicated for dual therapy but only 43% of them (n = 182/425) received this. During treatment, 28% (198/1406) required adjustments in medication but this was not done. The control of hypertension at six months after treatment initiation was 53% varying between 51% in community and 56% in large hospitals (p < .01). The hypertension control rate at last visit was 64% but varied between 59% in community hospitals and 71% in large hospitals (p < .01). Failure to adjust medication when required was associated with 30% decrease in the odds of hypertension control (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0. 50 to 0.90). Failure to comply with the treatment guidelines regarding adjustment of medication and lost to follow-up are possible target areas to improve hypertension control in Thailand.

Indexed as

HypertensionClinical AuditGuideline AdherenceHospitalsHumansMedication AdherenceMonitoring, PhysiologicThailandblood pressure controlclinical auditclinical practice guidelineshypertensionThailand

Identifiers

PMID33501760
PMCPMC8678746
OpenAlexW3123804461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.