Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33501944›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Molecular Evolution of Antigen-Processing Genes in Salamanders: Do They Coevolve with MHC Class I Genes?

Gemma Palomar, Katarzyna Dudek, Ben Wielstra, Elizabeth L Jockusch, Michal Vinkler, Jan W Arntzen, Gentile F Ficetola, Masatoshi Matsunami, Bruce Waldman, Martin Těšický and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Gemma PalomarInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Katarzyna DudekInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Ben WielstraInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Elizabeth L JockuschEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Michal VinklerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan W ArntzenNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gentile F FicetolaDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milano, Italy.
Masatoshi MatsunamiDepartment of Advanced Genomic and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-cho, Japan.
Bruce WaldmanDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Martin TěšickýDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Piotr ZielińskiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Wiesław BabikInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLCharles University · CZCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLeiden University · NLNaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLOklahoma State University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of the Ryukyus · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins encoded by antigen-processing genes (APGs) prepare antigens for presentation by the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) molecules. Coevolution between APGs and MHC I genes has been proposed as the ancestral gnathostome condition. The hypothesis predicts a single highly expressed MHC I gene and tight linkage between APGs and MHC I. In addition, APGs should evolve under positive selection, a consequence of the adaptive evolution in MHC I. The presence of multiple highly expressed MHC I genes in some teleosts, birds, and urodeles appears incompatible with the coevolution hypothesis. Here, we use urodele amphibians to test two key expectations derived from the coevolution hypothesis: 1) the linkage between APGs and MHC I was studied in Lissotriton newts and 2) the evidence for adaptive evolution in APGs was assessed using 42 urodele species comprising 21 genera from seven families. We demonstrated that five APGs (PSMB8, PSMB9, TAP1, TAP2, and TAPBP) are tightly linked (<0.5 cM) to MHC I. Although all APGs showed some codons under episodic positive selection, we did not find a pervasive signal of positive selection expected under the coevolution hypothesis. Gene duplications, putative gene losses, and divergent allelic lineages detected in some APGs demonstrate considerable evolutionary dynamics of APGs in salamanders. Overall, our results indicate that if coevolution between APGs and MHC I occurred in urodeles, it would be more complex than envisaged in the original formulation of the hypothesis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, MHC Class IAmphibian ProteinsAnimalsAntigen PresentationCaudataGene DuplicationGenetic LinkageAmphibian Proteinsantigen-processing genescoevolutionMHCmolecular evolutionPSMB lineagessalamanders

Identifiers

PMID33501944
PMCPMC7883663
OpenAlexW3122848755

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.