Evidence mapPaperPMID 33508786Full record

ReviewClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio (2D:4D) in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review of Case-control Studies.

Laura Fusar-Poli, Alessandro Rodolico, Serena Sturiale, Bianca Carotenuto, Antimo Natale, Davide Arillotta, Spyridon Siafis, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Eugenio Aguglia

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Fusar-PoliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-6947
Alessandro RodolicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-0601
Serena SturialeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-8907
Bianca CarotenutoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-1507
Antimo NataleDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-6371
Davide ArillottaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-0595
Spyridon SiafisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-2039
Maria Salvina SignorelliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-9454
Eugenio AgugliaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-7737
University of Catania · ITTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is an indirect, retrospective, non-invasive measure that correlates negatively with intrauterine exposure to testosterone. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate if 2D:4D differs between patients with psychiatric disorders and controls. In September 2019, we searched in Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINHAL, and retrieved 619 papers. We finally included 43 case-control studies which compared the 2D:4D ratio of patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n = 16), schizophrenia (n = 8), gender non-conformity (n = 7), addictions (n = 5), attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 4), mood disorders (n = 2), and intellectual disability (n = 1) to non-clinical controls. Meta-analyses showed that, overall, psychiatric patients had lower 2D:4D than healthy controls (n = 43, overall sample = 9,484, mean difference = -0.0056, 95% confidence interval from -0.0093 to -0.002, I

Indexed as

Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivityAutism spectrum disorderMental disordersMeta-analysisSubstance addictionTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID33508786
PMCPMC7851454
OpenAlexW3122640383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.