ReviewBioMed research international2021
Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role.
Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of Carotid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Identifying Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by Quantitative Flow Ratio: A Preliminary Prospective Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Safety of dobutamine or adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with left ventricular thrombus.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Role of Non-Invasive Multimodality Imaging in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Anatomical and Functional Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Focus on Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion and Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Qualitative and Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 2023 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography vs. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Changing Paradigms in the Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease by Multimodality Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The chronic coronary syndrome-Heart failure roundabout: A multimodality imaging workflow approach.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The Radiologist as a Gatekeeper in Chest Pain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence Based Multimodality Imaging: A New Frontier in Coronary Artery Disease Management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently published 2019 guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) focus on the need for noninvasive imaging modalities to accurately establish the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and assess the risk of clinical scenario occurrence. Appropriate patient management should rely on controlling symptoms, improving prognosis, and guiding each therapeutic strategy as well as monitoring disease progress. Among the noninvasive imaging modalities, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has gained broad acceptance in past years due to its unique features in providing a complete assessment of CAD through data on cardiac anatomy and function and myocardial viability, with high spatial and temporal resolution and without ionizing radiation. In detail, evaluation of the presence and extent of myocardial ischemia through stress CMR (S-CMR) has shown a high rule-in power in detecting functionally significant coronary artery stenosis in patients suspected of CCS. Moreover, S-CMR technique may add significant prognostic value, as demonstrated by different studies which have progressively evidenced the valuable power of this multiparametric imaging modality in predicting adverse cardiac events. The latest scientific progress supports a greater expansion of S-CMR with improvement of quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis, myocardial strain, and native mapping within the same examination. Although further study is warranted, these techniques, which are currently mostly restricted to the research field, are likely to become increasingly prevalent in the clinical setting with the scope of increasing accuracy in the selection of patients to be sent to invasive revascularization. This review investigates the diagnostic and prognostic role of S-CMR in the context of CAD, by analysing a strong, long-standing, scientific evidence together with an appraisal of new advanced techniques which may potentially enrich CAD management in the next future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.