Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511485›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2021

Structured Digital Self-Assessment of Patient Anamnesis Prior to Computed Tomography: Performance Evaluation and Added Value.

M Kopp, M Wetzl, F Geissler, J P Roth, R Wallner, D Hoefler, S Faby, T Allmendinger, P Amarteifio, W Wuest and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Before the examination: digital check-in].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M KoppDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. Markus.Kopp@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-8622
M WetzlDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
F GeisslerDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
J P RothDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
R Wallnere.Bavarian Health GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
D Hoeflere.Bavarian Health GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
S FabySiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
T AllmendingerSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
P AmarteifioSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
W WuestDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
A CavallaroDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
M UderDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
M S MayDepartement of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a tablet-based, digitized structured self-assessment (DSSA) of patient anamnesis (PA) prior to computed tomography (CT). Of the 317 patients consecutively referred for CT, the majority (n = 294) was able to complete the tablet-based questionnaire, which consisted of 67 items covering social anamnesis, lifestyle factors (e.g., tobacco abuse), medical history (e.g., kidney diseases), current symptoms, and the usability of the system. Patients were able to mark unclear questions for a subsequent discussion with the radiologist. Critical issues for the CT examination were structured and automatically highlighted as "red flags" (RFs) in order to improve patient interaction. RFs and marked questions were highly prevalent (69.5% and 26%). Missing creatinine values (33.3%), kidney diseases (14.4%), thyroid diseases (10.6%), metformin (5.5%), claustrophobia (4.1%), allergic reactions to contrast agents (2.4%), and pathological TSH values (2.0%) were highlighted most frequently as RFs. Patient feedback regarding the comprehensibility of the questionnaire and the tablet usability was mainly positive (90.9%; 86.2%). With advanced age, however, patients provided more negative feedback for both (p = 0.007; p = 0.039). The time effort was less than 20 min for 85.1% of patients, and faster patients were significantly younger (p = 0.046). Overall, the DSSA of PA prior to CT shows a high success rate and is well accepted by most patients. RFs and marked questions were common and helped to focus patients' interactions and reporting towards decisive aspects.

Indexed as

Self-AssessmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedFeedbackHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesComputed tomographyDigital informed patient consentDigital medical historyMobile devicesStructured anamnesis

Identifiers

PMID33511485
PMCPMC7843739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.