Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514530›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Time in range-A1c hemoglobin relationship in continuous glucose monitoring of type 1 diabetes: a real-world study.

Marina Valenzano, Ivan Cibrario Bertolotti, Adriano Valenzano, Giorgio Grassi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Relationship Between Time in Range and Dusk Phenomenon in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marina ValenzanoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3484-4626
Ivan Cibrario BertolottiInstitute of Electronics, Information and Telecommunication Engineering, CNR IEIIT, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-9993
Adriano ValenzanoInstitute of Electronics, Information and Telecommunication Engineering, CNR IEIIT, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-0808
Giorgio GrassiEndocrinology, Ospedale Molinette, Torino, Piemonte, Italy giorgio.grassi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-4219
Institute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe availability of easily accessible continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics can improve glycemic control in diabetes, and they may even become a viable alternative to hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) laboratory tests in the next years. The REALISM-T1D study (REAl-Life glucoSe Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes) was aimed at contributing, with real-world data, to a deeper understanding of these metrics, including the time in range (TIR)-HbA1c relationship, to facilitate their adoption by diabetologists in everyday practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methods70 adults affected by type 1 diabetes were monitored for 1 year by means of either flash (FGM) or real-time (rtCGM) glucose monitoring devices. Follow-up visits were performed after 90, 180 and 365 days from baseline and percentage TIR

resultsA monovariate linear regression analysis confirms a strong correlation between TIR and HbA1c as found in previous studies, but leveraging more homogeneous data (n=146) collected in real-life conditions. Differences were determined between FGM and rtCGM devices in Pearson's correlation (r

conclusionsRegression lines for two patient groups monitored through FGM and rtCGM devices, respectively, while confirming a linear relationship between TIR and A1c hemoglobin (A1C) in good accordance with previous studies, also show a statistically significant difference in the regression intercept, thus suggesting the need for different models tailored to device characteristics. The predictive power of A1C as a TIR estimator also deserves further investigations.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentscontinuous glucose monitoringhemoglobin A1cobservational studytype 1

Identifiers

PMID33514530
PMCPMC7849891
OpenAlexW3123398944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.