Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515285›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19: the never-ending story.

Amin Gasmi, Massimiliano Peana, Sadaf Noor, Roman Lysiuk, Alain Menzel, Asma Gasmi Benahmed, Geir Bjørklund

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coordination chemistry suggests that independently observed benefits of metformin and ZnBiometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Drugs for COVID-19: An Update.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Pseudoscience and fraudulent products for COVID-19 management.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Amin GasmiSociété Francophone de Nutrithérapie et de Nutrigénétique Appliquée, Villeurbanne, France.
Massimiliano PeanaDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy. peana@uniss.it.
Sadaf NoorInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Roman LysiukDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Alain MenzelLaboratoires Réunis, Junglinster, Luxembourg.
Asma Gasmi BenahmedAcadémie Internationale de Médecine Dentaire Intégrative, Paris, France.
Geir BjørklundCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (CONEM), Toften 24, 8610, Mo i Rana, Norway. bjorklund@conem.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-3935
Bahauddin Zakariya University · PKDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University · UASociété Francophone d’Arthroscopie · FRThe Research Council of Norway · NOUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anti-malarial drugs chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been suggested as promising agents against the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 that induces COVID-19 and as a possible therapy for shortening the duration of the viral disease. The antiviral effects of CQ and HCQ have been demonstrated in vitro due to their ability to block viruses like coronavirus SARS in cell culture. CQ and HCQ have been proposed to reduce immune reactions to infectious agents, inhibit pneumonia exacerbation, and improve lung imaging investigations. CQ analogs have also revealed the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in treating viral infections and related ailments. There was, moreover, convincing evidence from early trials in China about the efficacy of CQ and HCQ in the anti-COVID-19 procedure. Since then, research and studies have been massive to ascertain these drugs' efficacy and safety in treating the viral disease. In the present review, we construct a synopsis of the main properties and current data concerning the metabolism of CQ/HCQ, which were the basis of assessing their potential therapeutic roles against the new coronavirus infection. The effective role of QC and HCQ in the prophylaxis and therapy of COVID-19 infection is discussed in light of the latest international medical-scientific research results. KEY POINTS: • Data concerning metabolism and properties of CQ/HCQ are discussed. • The efficacy of CQ/HCQ against COVID-19 has been the subject of contradictory results. • CQ/HCQ has little or no effect in reducing mortality in SARS-CoV-2-affected patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AntimalarialsAntiviral AgentsChloroquineHumansHydroxychloroquineAntimalarialsAntiviral AgentsChloroquineHydroxychloroquineChloroquineCOVID-19HydroxychloroquineMetabolismSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33515285
PMCPMC7847229
OpenAlexW3125819062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.