Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516155›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology2021

Update on the Health Effects of Bisphenol A: Overwhelming Evidence of Harm.

Frederick S Vom Saal, Laura N Vandenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Bisphenols and follicle function in farm species.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederick S Vom SaalUniversity of Missouri - Columbia, Division of Biological Sciences, Columbia, Missouri.
Laura N VandenbergUniversity of Massachusetts - Amherst, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Metabolomics Administrative Supplement: Disruption of parity-induced tumor suppressor pathways by xenoestrogen exposures during pregnancyU01ES026140 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI JERRY, D. JOSEPH, SCHNEIDER, SALLIE SMITH · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
BPA: Cellular and epigenetic effects on the urethraU01ES020952 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI VOM SAAL, FREDERICK S · 2011 to 2014
$750k
NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES020952NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES026140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1997, the first in vivo bisphenol A (BPA) study by endocrinologists reported that feeding BPA to pregnant mice induced adverse reproductive effects in male offspring at the low dose of 2 µg/kg/day. Since then, thousands of studies have reported adverse effects in animals administered low doses of BPA. Despite more than 100 epidemiological studies suggesting associations between BPA and disease/dysfunction also reported in animal studies, regulatory agencies continue to assert that BPA exposures are safe. To address this disagreement, the CLARITY-BPA study was designed to evaluate traditional endpoints of toxicity and modern hypothesis-driven, disease-relevant outcomes in the same set of animals. A wide range of adverse effects was reported in both the toxicity and the mechanistic endpoints at the lowest dose tested (2.5 µg/kg/day), leading independent experts to call for the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) to be dropped 20 000-fold from the current outdated LOAEL of 50 000 µg/kg/day. Despite criticism by members of the Endocrine Society that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s assumptions violate basic principles of endocrinology, the FDA rejected all low-dose data as not biologically plausible. Their decisions rely on 4 incorrect assumptions: dose responses must be monotonic, there exists a threshold below which there are no effects, both sexes must respond similarly, and only toxicological guideline studies are valid. This review details more than 20 years of BPA studies and addresses the divide that exists between regulatory approaches and endocrine science. Ultimately, CLARITY-BPA has shed light on why traditional methods of evaluating toxicity are insufficient to evaluate endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleHumansMaleMicePhenolsPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsToxicity TestsBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsPhenolsbiomonitoringendocrine disruptorguideline studieslow dosenonmonotonic dose responsethreshold

Identifiers

PMID33516155
PMCPMC7846099
OpenAlexW3088847080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.